Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Momaw Nadon

Newt has his panties in a wad over not leveling with the people about the future of Sec'y Rumsfeld. He is therefore advocating nothing being withheld from reporters when they ask. Since when. Don't want to speculate what he'd advise Romney under similar circumstances.


10 posted on 11/10/2006 7:00:00 PM PST by pacpam (action=consequence applies in all cases)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: pacpam

Newt has his panties in a wad over not leveling with the people about the future of Sec'y Rumsfeld.
-----
I did not agree with it either, for solid political reasons. Bush had the chance to show willingness to change direction...but he chose not too. It would have helped.


15 posted on 11/10/2006 7:02:47 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: pacpam

And rightly so. Bush screwed the pooch on that one. Here, you've got the opposition party running on 'A new direction in Iraq' and you could have taken that entirely away from them a couple weeks before the election. Bush's action was beyond dumb on this.


39 posted on 11/10/2006 7:16:28 PM PST by perfect_rovian_storm ( Churchill was rebuffed too before he led his people to victory. Rick Santorum in 08!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson