1 posted on
11/10/2006 5:33:33 PM PST by
Pokey78
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: Pokey78
2 posted on
11/10/2006 5:37:26 PM PST by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: Pokey78
Yeah, Noemie. It was.
3 posted on
11/10/2006 5:38:48 PM PST by
RichInOC
("You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you.")
To: Pokey78
The author lost me by equating Joe McCarthy, a U.S. Senator - with Michael Moore, a schlockumentarian filmmaker
4 posted on
11/10/2006 5:38:49 PM PST by
karnage
To: Pokey78
Yup. Not that bad. Unless, of course, you're serving in the military, or you're an Iraqi working to be free. Then, life sucks.
To: Pokey78
McCain and Guiliani, two of the biggest hawks in the country
WHAT?
The Weekly Standard has lost it.
6 posted on
11/10/2006 5:42:19 PM PST by
Terpfen
(Conservatives who stayed home have cost us a non-activist Supreme Court and tax cuts.)
To: Pokey78
Few conservatives are morose at the loss of the House
I say again... WHAT?
Yeah, conservatives are happy that John Conyers can issue subpoenas and that Charlie Rangel chairs the Ways and Means Committee. Right.
The Weekly Standard has gone squishy.
7 posted on
11/10/2006 5:43:44 PM PST by
Terpfen
(Conservatives who stayed home have cost us a non-activist Supreme Court and tax cuts.)
To: Pokey78
Another "Win by losing" idiot heard from. They did everything they could to make this happen. Very well they can go away and celebrate their triumph with their buddies the Dems. You do NOT play political power games with National Security. The War on Terror was in the balances and these morons played political games with it.
They can hit the door. They can go stick their knives in the Democrats backs for a change.
8 posted on
11/10/2006 5:44:29 PM PST by
MNJohnnie
(The Democrat Party: Hard on Taxpayers, Soft on Terrorism!)
To: Pokey78
Nice try Pokey.
If one thing was "good" about getting stomped, it's this:
We got rid of some poor leadership in the House (Hastert, not a bad guy, maybe a little to unwilling to seize the reins of Authority)
And the Senate. Bill Frist is decent man, he is a knowledgeable man, he is a erudite man.
He also wasn't a great leader. Perhaps he sought consensus too often and didn't put the Senate's feet to the fire enough.
10 posted on
11/10/2006 5:46:47 PM PST by
padre35
("money is the crack cocaine of politics" J. McCain before he left for a fundraiser)
To: Pokey78
Now the rats won't have the dubious luxury of voting for show to display to their lib/socialist constituents.. they actually might have to think of the real consequences since they have the majority.. not much consolation, and I fear our survival, but they are going to have a lot harder time shifting the blame.
14 posted on
11/10/2006 5:49:17 PM PST by
SeaBiscuit
(God Bless America and All who protect and preserve this Great Nation.)
To: Pokey78
I don't folks. I agree with some of the points in this article:
1. Certainly better now than 2008
2. Lamont did lose which blows a hole in the its-all-about-Iraq theory.
3. In every life a little rain must fall.
4. Maybe somethiing else -- but I can't remember what.
15 posted on
11/10/2006 5:50:51 PM PST by
tdewey10
(Can we please take out iran's nuclear capability before they start using it?)
To: Pokey78
Anybody who equates Joe McCarthy with Michael Moore is too ignorant to be worth listening to. . .
16 posted on
11/10/2006 5:57:41 PM PST by
Iconoclast2
(Two wings of the same bird of prey . . .)
To: RepoGirl
20 posted on
11/10/2006 6:03:41 PM PST by
Big Guy and Rusty 99
(proud sponsor of the "helmets for democrats" foundation)
To: Pokey78
Yeah, it wasn't that bad.
Well, other the fact that our young men and women fighting for us in Iraq (including my nephew) and elsewhere got their teeth kicked down their throats by the electorate, who evidently have as much respect for the troops as Senator Kerry.
Of course, our allies will now have good cause to doubt our resolve. Not to mention our enemies. Pfffft. Who cares?
And so it's now open season on the unborn. Big deal.
Naturally, we can forget border security. What a silly, outdated concept in this "one world" era. A wall would, you know, offend the illegal immigrants.
And of course, massive wealth transfers from society's achievers to society's leeches isn't that big a deal, is it? This won't affect the entrepreneurial spirit, right?
A new Supreme Court vacancy soon? Cool! Teddy, Hillary!, Boxer, et al have effective veto power with respect to the replacement. Anyone have a problem with that?
Welcome to New France.
21 posted on
11/10/2006 6:05:02 PM PST by
southernnorthcarolina
(Some people are like Slinkies: totally useless, but fun to throw down a stair.)
To: Pokey78
... 7) Freepers will start kickin' butt again! (Remember the "Freeper Air Force"?)
23 posted on
11/10/2006 6:15:48 PM PST by
The Duke
(I have met the enemy, and he is named 'Apathy'!)
To: Pokey78
NOT THAT BAD??? HAVE ANOTHER GLASS OF KOOL AID AND CALL THE MORTICIAN IN THE MORNING!!!
Didn't bother to read this.
All I needed to know about the elections and who is now in(scarry and disastrous) power, I learned back in the early 70's after serving in Nam for 18 months and seeing how they (the same LEFTIST-SOCIALIST-BLAME-HATE-AMERICA-Party and Mindset) stabbed the S. Vietnamese (as well as 2 1/3 million Nam Vets) in the back.
THEY ARE ALL:
DEMOC
S
To: Pokey78
What a dumn-ass article. Trying to pretty up a pig. It was a wuppin' and our boys got spanked. Now its time to regroup and fight back.
To: Pokey78
the sears tower is an eyesore anyway.
32 posted on
11/10/2006 6:42:41 PM PST by
longfellow
(Bill Maher, the 21st hijacker.)
To: Pokey78
The ultimate pony finder.
33 posted on
11/10/2006 6:45:17 PM PST by
TET1968
(SI MINOR PLUS EST ERGO NIHIL SUNT OMNIA)
To: Pokey78
As for me, I am sick about what happened in this election. The Dems never did say what they were FOR because if they had, the swing voters would not have voted for them.
Today we read about what they are FOR. And this is only the beginning. It's going to get a whole lot worse.
Here is the positive I see .. if they do what they say they are going to do .. they are going to loe in 2008. Problem is who is going to run as a Republican? I would have to hold my nose to vote for McCain. I would though. I would do that before I allowed my lack of voting get us Hillary.
34 posted on
11/10/2006 6:46:16 PM PST by
CometBaby
(You can twist perceptions .. reality won't budge!)
To: Pokey78
A stupid article. I wonder if the Dems wrote such articles when they controlled the House for 40 straight years and 58 years out of 62 during the period 1933-95. Or the Senate for 54 years out of 62.
Harry Reid talked today about checks and balances. I wonder if believes the Reps should win the Presidency in 2008, since the Dems now control Congress. This is all crap and rationalization. If the Reps think that this can be easily reversed, they are in for a rude awakening.
37 posted on
11/10/2006 7:02:32 PM PST by
kabar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson