Posted on 11/10/2006 3:00:44 PM PST by RussP
I actually liked Michael Savage at one time, but now I am embarrassed for him every time I hear him (which is not often). The guy has become a clueless loon.
To show off his "independence," he refused to endorse Republicans. Fantastic, Michael! Then the day after the election it finally occurred to him that a Democratic Congress is now empowered to work with Bush on his amnesty program for illegal immigrants!
What kind of moron could not figure that out *before* the election?
Thanks a lot, Michael, for sitting on your hands and doing nothing when it counted most to help stop illegal immigration. You're a true patriot, but not a very bright one!
Michael calls Rush Limbaugh a shill for the Republicans, but Rush figured out *before* the election that (1) Bush is not on the ballot, and (2) if the Republicans don't win Congress, the Democrats will. In other words, Rush passed politics 101 a long time ago, but Michael never did.
I happened to be listening yesterday when a caller tried to point this out to him. How did Michael reply? He couldn't argue rationally, so he resorted to his usual 3rd-grade-level name calling and telling the guy to change his underwear. I kid you not.
Ironically, Michael wrote a book calling liberalism a mental illness, but Michael clearly has a mental illness of his own. He has become some kind of deranged, angry clown.
You are celebrating the loss of the GOP controlled House and Senate?
No I'm not celebrating...Thanks to Bush..we now have a controlled Demoncrat house and senate who are going to cut and run on the war in Iraq making the US look weak making us vulnerable, amnesty for illegals, the demoncrats want taxpayer funded stem cell research, Hillary's healthcare...the list goes on.
If you read my earlier first post on the this thread I did say to Ross Savage did support the GOP which Ross has continually denied..tell him Savage supported the GOP.
Savage trashed me too? I could hang with Savage quite comfortably and have some laughs.
Apparently you can't discern between someone who speaks the truth and states facts and someone that spews bs like limbaugh or hannity or all the other republican hacks out there.
Apparently you don't listen often enough to the Weiner.
He is all over the map about everything. One day is is for the brutal execution of the war, the next he is crying about excessive bombing. He is against the GOP, he is for it.
There are many reasons why the GOP lost, and Mike Weiner surely didn't help the GOP, that's for sure.
He spews stupid anti-Bush rhetoric like a mind numbed robot of the Jewish left. Then every other sentence he deconstructs the stupidity of the democrats and leftwing media.
Every third sentence is a reminder that he has phD and lives in San Francisco.
Maybe if he could get out more to fly-over country he wouldn't sound so schizophrenic.
Not a huge fan of Savage, or Rush for that matte,r but one hute problem with this articles critique...
Rush openly admitted to shilling for the Republicans the day after the elections.. perhaps if he had not, and had called them to the carpet prior to the elections, instead of carrying water for them, they might have done something to win.
He is all over the map about everything. One day is is for the brutal execution of the war, the next he is crying about excessive bombing. He is against the GOP, he is for it.
I've never heard hims cry about excessive bombing...all I have ever heard him say is to bomb the crap out of them.
He is for the GOP to do what is right and to be patriots, but they are not.
michael, is that you?
"Mike is also the only one in talk radio who criticized the GOP BEFORE the election." - JayVan
JayVan -
With all due respect, that is absolutely not true. Rush and Hannity have repeatedly hammered Bush on issues such as the prescription drug entitlement, immigration issues, NCLB, weakness in dealing with liberalism, and so on. The difference with Michael "I love poodles" Savage and Rush & Hannity is Savage argues with emotions, Rush argues with solid facts, and Hannity argues with a sensible does of emotion backed up with facts.
"How vast is your hatred for the guy when you attack his deceased mother..where is your basic civility? Every time I've heard him speak about his mother he has a deep respect and love for her."
The one time I heard him talk about his mother he said she would not bother to listen to him on the radio. Sounds to me like he may have inherited his a--hole gene from her.
"As far as him a loser...pretty successful to me! A millionaire, PHD, and has written several New York Times best sellers."
Yes, thanks to suckers like you.
"Your question should be..why did the republicans lose instead of blaming a talk radio host which is ridiculous."
You're not too bright are you. I never blamed Savage-Weiner alone, but it was certainly people like him who stood by and watched as Congress was handed over the the Dems.
They bashed on a whole lot more than that.....if you actually listened to their shows on something akin to a regular basis you would be well aware of the facts. Should they not have expressed conservative views on McLame, Chafey, Herriet Meyers,and Lindsey Graham? You seem to be unwilling to accept the fact that Savage is the little boy out there trying hard to scream the loudest because all the heavyweights in the business are leaving him in the proverbial dust.
Time talking to you is wasted like the American people trying to tell the Republicans to give up their money grabbing greedy ways and become patriots for this country that is why they are losers and you are too!
Good riddance. I'll continue bashing Savage-Weiner without your help then. He earned it.
Bingo. And let me add that Savage-Weiner is the type of person who tries to get ahead by bashing others (e.g., Rush) rather than on his own merits.
[Yes, I realize that I am bashing Savage-Weiner, but I have no plans to become a radio talk-show host.]
I didn't get a chance to tune to the Savage-Weiner "Nation" today. Gosh, I wonder what the Great Weiner talked about today. Oh, did he rant and rail and get all worked up about Nancy Pelosi, Alcee Hastings, Harry Reid and gang? Could you just picture his face turning beet red and his veins popping?
But I'll bet dollars to dimes the Great Weiner forgot to mention that the foxes are in charge of the henhouse precisely because idiots like him stood around with their thumbs in their asses when they had a chance to do something about it! Like Bernard Shaw on CNN, the Great Weiner refused to lower himself and take sides.
And a few fools here on FR fall for his schtick. Not many, but a few.
Thanks for responding.
I like to send test posts to certain people sometimes to see where they're coming from.
Once again, thanks for the reply.
I commend you for your improvement.
Nonsense.
Anyone can see your level of immaturity by reading your posts on your own thread.
Truth be told, I *am* a bit of a hot-head at times, but compared to Savage-Weiner I am a saint.
Savage-Weiner has the emotional maturity of an elementary schoolboy. When he has no rational argument, which is often, he routinely resorts to yelling and childish name-calling with veins popping. He is a major stain on conservatism -- not to mention the human race.
People who cannot see that are simply in denial of the obvious or are mental pygmies themselves. Sorry, but the truth is the truth.
Members of the Midget Brigade were calling in...you should of listened and gave Savage a call...he could of helped you with your "Little Man Syndrome".
Should of?
You don't read much, do you?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.