NAMBLA supports illegal activity.
It's illegal in the United States but that makes no difference. For what it's worth, NAMBLA was based out of Denmark the last I heard. If Walmart supported any organization, illegal or not, and that organization was one in which you are opposed, perhaps then you would better understand the position of the AFA.
And legally protected minorities or not, Walmart has past the point for what many consider acceptable, some of whom have decided to stop doing business with Walmart which is their personal decision based on Walmart's actions.
Obviously it is the right of anybody to choose who and who they will not do business with. However if someone is going to post on an open political forum information on a boycott, or any other subject then those of us who feel the boycott to be unwise (stupid) also have a right dissent.
I know that other companies offer such things or have offered such things. But I've never heard of Walmart doing it in the past, but I don't work in that industry.
It's illegal in the United States but that makes no difference. For what it's worth, NAMBLA was based out of Denmark the last I heard. If Walmart supported any organization, illegal or not, and that organization was one in which you are opposed, perhaps then you would better understand the position of the AFA.
Do you have any evidence that Walmart supports NAMBLA? If not, throwing out an open ended question like that only serves to make lose insinuations that Walmart supports similarly horrible groups. If you want to use such a group as an example, you should at least try and make it clear that you don't have evidence that they support NAMBLA or another such group. Otherwise you're making a dishonest character attack, maybe not intentionally, but it's still the end result.
As for understanding the position of the AFA, I know for a fact that Walmart does provide a lot of support for groups I do like. They also do more to benefit the communities in which they do business than their competitors such as Kmart.
I've also seen dishonest attack after dishonest attack on Walmart by groups who misrepresent the facts because they don't think I'd make the "proper" choice if they portrayed the situation honestly.
Companies also have legal obligations in many areas to do work with groups that they may not support due to the fact that we have let our government try and insert itself into every aspect of our lives.
Therefore in my opinion the burden of proof that Walmart isn't remaining neutral and is instead supporting CCBLBT is in the hands of the AHA.
A 5% commission on sales through the CCBLBT web site doesn't sound like they are giving the CCBLBT a particularly generous deal.
In my opinion, people treat their supporters as fools who must be lied to in order to do the right thing aren't conservatives, they are liberals.
Calling them conservatives simply because they are opposed to homosexuality is like calling gun grabbers conservatives because they oppose people having a right to keep and bear arms.