I notice you ask a lot of questions, but you avoid answering inconvenient ones that I have posted. You still haven't addressed the questions which I posed in my first reply to you on this thread (#182).
Regarding "what radar," I've already stated that I don't know the provenance of the radar with the information I have at hand. Did you not understand what this means?
ML/NJ
See this is where the fun in questioning comes in. You have some unknown, unidentified, radar system which says they saw 3 submarines surface and submerge. We don't know who was running the radars or how they knew they were submerging submarines or if they've ever seen a sub submerge on radar before. We know it can't be a military radar because, after all, they shot down the plane to begin with and would hardly be expected to provide the damning evidence themselves. What other radar is out there? No government agency routinely scans the coast with a surface search radar, about the only non-military government radars I'm aware of are for things like Air Traffic Control and weather tracking. And it can't be Air Traffic Control because that would hardly be expected to pick up surface contacts. So given all this any reasonably intelligent individual would begin to wonder just what radar they could be talking about. And raising that quesition easily raises others. Unless, of course, one is merely interested in supporting their own agenda.
I do. It means you're making assertions from unsourced evidence. Also known as flinging a load of crap.