[Non-Sequitur]

You don't give up easy, do you?

Rather than address the question of unidentified 'witnesses' let's look at some of the verifiable claims made. This one for instance:

"Kallstrom, who headed the FBI's TWA 800 investigation, told me ­ and I have this on tape ­ that three radar targets close to the crash site were Navy vessels on a classified maneuver. We know they were submarines because the radar tracks disappeared when TWA 800 crashed."

Let's start with this. Most obvious question is, radar tapes from where?

[ml/nj]

You don't give up easy (sic), do you?

Not when I'm right, I don't.

I don't have access where I am to my TWA files, so I don't know how much information I have on the provenance of the radar tapes that show the movement of the various objects in the area of the crash.

Have you never seen this data? If you have seen it, do you think it has been faked? I'm really not sure what your point is except maybe obfuscation. Do you doubt Reed Irvine's account? That's what your pull quote is. It is not the data itself, but rather Reed quoting Kallstrom. My own experience (including personal conversations, not just reading what he had written) with Reed Irvine was that he was very careful with his assertions.

ML/NJ