Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh: Why Republicans Lost
news.com.au ^ | 9 November 2006

Posted on 11/08/2006 4:50:12 PM PST by Aussie Dasher

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 381-385 next last
Comment #81 Removed by Moderator

To: 69ConvertibleFirebird
Well since you asked, here is my take on why Santorum lost...like an onion many layers, and they all stink.

Pennsylvania has an older population (second only to Florida I believe). Many have voted straight democratic all their lives and continue the routine year after year after year...

Because we have so many oldsters (who remember the good old days) they actually thought they were voting for Bob Casey (not Junior). The late Casey senior was a very popular governor...pro-life, pro-gun, Roman Catholic. So pro-life was he that the Clintonista's banished him from speaking at the 2nd Convention Coronation of Bill. A voter not paying attention wouldn't have noticed that it was the son not the father...Junior was pretty much in hiding that last weeks of the campaign.

Lastly, being pro-life and pro-Second Amendment, Casey offered a 'safe' alternative to Santorum and a vote against Santorum was seen as a vote against the President (Melissa Hart also suffered this fate...MoveOn.Org had really sleezy ads running the last week catching Hart (and by association Santorum) 'red handed' for voting with the President 90 some percent of the time.

Just my two cents...still too dazed here to be really coherent.

Sad to be tagged as,

PennsylvaniaMom

82 posted on 11/08/2006 5:30:21 PM PST by PennsylvaniaMom (Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
From what I can see, Rush ain't wrong!

But but he didn't mention the EVIL LIBERTARIANS! [insert evil music]

83 posted on 11/08/2006 5:30:56 PM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Oh btw, the article was horribly written.


84 posted on 11/08/2006 5:31:33 PM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf
I think what you are saying applies to most of your Democrat friends and neighbors, but I believe that the national party leaders DO want us to lose in Iraq - or at least they don't care if we win or not - as long as whatever happens helps to keep them in power. The Moonbats hate GWB so much that they wish for anything that puts him in a bad light.
85 posted on 11/08/2006 5:31:53 PM PST by srmorton (Choose life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

He's almost entirely wrong. The man who is so proud to have not graduated from college could stand to read some history to better ground himself for a macro analysis. Then he would do well to test his theory on every individual loss, where he would find that it wouldn't come close to explaining the majority.

Rush has no idea how to win an election. His single contribution to yesterdays results was inserting himself into the national news as a clown making fun of Fox.


86 posted on 11/08/2006 5:31:55 PM PST by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin

Maybe true. Oddly enough, Frist's seat was the one closely-contested seat in the U.S. Senate that remained in GOP hands after yesterday.


87 posted on 11/08/2006 5:32:58 PM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
The Democrats all won by NARROW margins

Ken Blackwell lost by 23 points in a state that elected Voinovich by 30.

88 posted on 11/08/2006 5:33:29 PM PST by staytrue (Tancredo/Buchanan for 2008-All RINOS MUST GO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chimera

Anyone out there know just what happened to Mark Sanford in North Carolina?
He got slammed along with everyone else.


89 posted on 11/08/2006 5:34:17 PM PST by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Owen

Do you have any links to polls that support that theory?


90 posted on 11/08/2006 5:34:17 PM PST by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Owen
The Exit Polls Were Correct. They had only a few percent of skew, but the important part of them was the question: What issue was more important to your vote today? Look it up. It wasn't immigration. It wasn't the economy. AND IT WASN'T IRAQ. The #1 issue was corruption scandals.

It's very important for you and everyone else to understand this critical point:

exit polls are NOT true scientific polls! They are certainly more accurate than an internet poll posted on a web site, but they aren't at all representative of a random, evenly distributed sample of people. They only measure people who actually went out to vote as opposed to people who stay home, and furthermore they don't take into account the significant biases of people who von't and don't want to answer the exit poll.

As a true gauge of the sentiment of the people, exit polls are only a little bit better than worthless.

91 posted on 11/08/2006 5:35:35 PM PST by jpl (Victorious warriors win first, then go to war; defeated warriors go to war first, then seek to win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
Wonder what would have happened if Rummie had resigned a week ago.

Bad timing!

92 posted on 11/08/2006 5:38:15 PM PST by FixitGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chimera

You don't understand what i mean...you are a freeper...you know about 1000 times more about the nuances of politics than the everyday joe in America...the pubs have held the power for a while now and IMO they squandered a lot of it and this led to a throw the bums out mentality...don't analyze it with a fine point...think Reagan and how he a got a general swell of confidence from the masses even though he was facing a monolithic media storm...Bush and the present pub leadership can't communicate well to them( be honest, Bush makes you nervous when he speaks)....sure us freepers know the game but how bout the great unwashed?


93 posted on 11/08/2006 5:39:04 PM PST by chasio649
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
"It is silly to blame the media; it is silly to blame the Democrats; it is silly to go out and try to find all these excuses,” Rush said.

What? No attacks on the "LIBERAL-tarians" by El Rushbo that has been spewed by other FReepers ad nauseum?

94 posted on 11/08/2006 5:39:42 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Why can't Republicans stand up to Democrats like they do to terrorists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
He did not mean that the Dems as a whole are REALLY conservative. He meant that they recruited conservative candidates to run against Republicans in marginal districts. At least, their candidates sounded conservative enough so that conservative Democrats and (alas) many Republicans felt comfortable voting for them.
95 posted on 11/08/2006 5:40:00 PM PST by srmorton (Choose life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: A Federal Republican

"I always vote ... but I can sympathize with those who saw extraordinarily little reason to do so this year."

They are the reason we lost the Senate.


96 posted on 11/08/2006 5:40:26 PM PST by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

Republicans have tried to play "Leftist Lite" in a political ploy to try and garner more votes. They lost sight of what motivated the Reagan Democrats.


97 posted on 11/08/2006 5:41:52 PM PST by P.O.E.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gramho12
I think what Rush was saying that the conservatives did not get real suppport from the top down. When you support the likes of Spector over Toomey, for example, it starts a trend. Rather than educating and communicating the positive side of conservatism, and getting people excited about your ideals, then the message is lost. Plus, actions speak louder than words, and neither the Senate nor the House did anything to advance smaller government or cut spending

It was from the top down. Bush needs to take most of the blame. He had the hammer to veto spending bills, etc. His responsibility was to set the example. He flat failed us for 6 yrs.

98 posted on 11/08/2006 5:42:05 PM PST by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Frist is just one of many reasons the GOP lost, but lack of leadership was the biggest reason IMO. Hagel, McCain and Graham have a lot to do with why the GOP lost. And the last minute balk by the GOP on the Patriot Act made W look like he had lost control of the party. GOP has a rebuilding job to do, do they have the horses to do it?


99 posted on 11/08/2006 5:42:47 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: gotribe
"I would, too, but I can't swim."

Hell, the fall will probably kill ya!

100 posted on 11/08/2006 5:44:26 PM PST by 2111USMC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 381-385 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson