Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh: Why Republicans Lost
news.com.au ^ | 9 November 2006

Posted on 11/08/2006 4:50:12 PM PST by Aussie Dasher

Republicans lost control of the House, and perhaps the Senate, because they abandoned their conservative principles and in the end stood for nothing, Rush Limbaugh said today.

In his Wednesday broadcast, America’s top talker said that until Republicans begin asking themselves what’s wrong with themselves they are never going to fix their problems.

When things go wrong, Rush said, "you must look inward and ask first, ‘What did we do wrong? What could we have done better? What mistakes did we make?”

Commenting that although Republicans lost, "Conservatism did not lose, Republicanism lost last night. Republicanism, being a political party first, rather than an ideological movement, is what lost last night.”

The Democrats, he said "beat something last night with nothing. They advanced no agenda other than their usual anti-war position. They had no contract — they really never did get specific. Their message was one of ‘vote for us; the other guys have been in power too long.’”

Rush further admonished, "There was no dominating conservative message that came from the [Republican] top and filtered down throughout in this campaign.”

He added that if there was conservatism in the campaign, it was on the Democratic side: "There were conservative Democrats running for office in the House of Representatives and in a couple of Senate races won by Democrats yesterday.” He cited James Webb as an example.

He also said it was conservatism that won fairly big when it was tried yesterday, but it was Democrats who ran as conservatives and not their GOP rivals. He added that the Democratic leadership had gone out and recruited conservative candidates because they knew liberals could not win running against Republicans in red states.

Rush quoted Thomas Sowell as explaining that the latest example of election fraud is actually what the Democrats did — they nominated a bunch of moderate and conservative candidates for the express purpose of electing a far-left Democratic leadership.

"The Democrats could not have won the House, being liberals,” Rush said. "Liberalism didn’t win anything yesterday; Republicanism lost. Conservatism was nowhere to be found except on the Democratic side.”

The root of the problem, Rush said, is that "our side hungers for ideological leadership and we’re not getting it from the top. Conservatism was nowhere to be found in this campaign from the top. The Democrats beat something with nothing. They didn’t have to take a stand on anything other than their usual anti-war positions. They had no clear agenda and they didn’t dare offer one. Liberalism will still lose every time it’s offered.”

Republicans, Rush said, allowed themselves to be defined. "Without elected conservative leadership from the top Republicans in the House and Senate republicans are free to freelance and say the hell with party unity.”

That leads, Rush said, to the emergence of RINOs — Republicans in name only.

Republicans in Congress, Rush explained, were held captive by the party’s leadership in the White House. They were put into a position of having to endorse policies with which as conservatives they disagreed.

"The Democratic Party,” Rush went on to say, "is the party of entitlements; but the Republicans come up with this Medicare prescription drug plan that the polls said that the public didn’t want and was not interested in. That is not conservatism. Conservatives do not grow the government and offer entitlements as a means of buying votes. But that’s what the Republicans in Congress had to support in order to stay in line with the Party from the top.

"It is silly to blame the media; it is silly to blame the Democrats; it is silly to go out and try to find all these excuses,” Rush said. "We have proved that we can beat them … we have proved that we can withstand whatever we get from the drive-by media. Conservatism does that — conservatism properly applied, proudly, eagerly, with vigor and honesty will triumph over that nine times out of 10 in this current political and social environment. It just wasn’t utilized in this campaign.”

Rush also blamed the failure to embrace conservatism on Republican’s fear of being criticized from those in the so-called establishment. Republicans, he charged, go out of their way to avoid being criticized, fearing they will be characterized as extremists and kooks.

As a result conservatism gets watered down, and the GOP loses the support of the nation’s conservative majority Rush stated.

Anything can beat nothing, Rush concluded, "and it happened yesterday.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: defeat; gop; leroygonefederal; reasons; rushlimbaugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-385 next last
To: jude24

See my #360.


361 posted on 11/09/2006 1:51:49 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 349 | View Replies]

To: ovrtaxt
Yeah without a doubt we now know that "New Tone" blows. Plus the "Big Tent" vote didn't show up either. So much for sucking up to the middle and left for votes.

We spent to much time on trying to make a better image and avoiding criticism instead of wielding power that was given to us to change things and prove that conservatism works best and earning the votes that are needed to keep America strong. *sigh* Now we are out of power what a waste. Hopefully we can learn from these mistakes and relearn from 1994 what it takes to win elections.
362 posted on 11/09/2006 3:14:28 PM PST by Captain Beyond (The Hammer of the gods! (Just a cool line from a Led Zep song))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian; George W. Bush; Dr. Eckleburg; P-Marlowe; jude24; blue-duncan

I don't believe that any true family man can be a pacifist. Mike Dukakis agreeing to let a thug take out Kitty might be what Kitty deserves, but husbands/fathers will kill to protect their own lives or those of their kids. That is a microcosm of Just War at the national level.

Therefore, the notion that 3000 dead is some outrageous number is belied by too many facts in America, OP. There are some 40000 killed annually on the highways, tens of thousands to various types of murder, and staggering thousands to heart disease, cancer, etc.

Where are the pickets at General Motors? Instead they get to sponsor the Super Bowl.

The Al-Qaeda Super Bowl brought to you by Bin Laden Engineering, Frito-Lay, and Coors Light.

There was all kinds of slaying going on in the bible and some of it wasn't especially principled. It was done for survival and this is about survival.

In case no one had noticed.


363 posted on 11/09/2006 3:27:17 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and proud of it! Supporting our troops means praying for them to WIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith

Well I don't put it past the Clintons to use the divide and conquer strategy and there are certainly no shortage of useful idiots for them to puppeteer.

It is a new angle though that the split would come from the left of the party. Maybe a strong fiscal conservative candidate could stop that from happening. What disaffection is there in the more liberal wing of the Republican party that could bring about enough angst for them to give there vote to a 3rd party candidate? Other than the bloating budget I can't think of anything.


364 posted on 11/09/2006 3:48:39 PM PST by kuma (Mark Sanford '08 http://www.petitiononline.com/msan2008/petition.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Wow, what a provocative post from you.

I hope you don't scare the congregation with such bold thinking. They might have trouble sleeping in church!

You raised some good points there. A lot of people don't care about all the other things that will kill you and will killing thousands every day, sometimes preventably.

But dead is still dead to the dead. They don't feel better to die in a car wreck than in a terror attack.

We could, for instance, almost eliminate traffic deaths if we imposed a national speed limit of 25mph highway, 10mph town. We'd save more people the first month than perished in 9/11. Who is crying for those people killed and maimed in actual preventable accidents that we know will occur? If the annual death toll has held at 40,000-42,000 per annum since around 1990, then we could easily save more people in a month next month and forever more than died in the 9/11 attack. So why don't we? And how do we claim to care so much for people if we don't? Are people who die in terrorist attacks worth so much more than those who die in generally preventable traffic accidents?

Much of this comes down to expectations about death. We may let thousands or millions die routinely from things we could prevent, if we had the will. But we object extremely if some outsider kills them instead. As we should. But this great concern for life is still kind of selective and not so consistent when you look closely.

It's a philosophical matter, I guess.
365 posted on 11/09/2006 3:49:28 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
"Republicanism lost last night. Republicanism, being a political party first, rather than an ideological movement, is what lost last night.”
366 posted on 11/09/2006 5:02:39 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aussie Dasher
Santourm pissed off his base by backing pro-abortion, former democrat district attorney, Sen. Arlen Specter instead of the very, pro-life Congressman Toomey for US Senate. His base didn't forget the back stabbing. Santorum forgot that it was "the people" who put him in and he was responsible to "the people" not to Arlen Specter or the RINO establishment.
367 posted on 11/09/2006 9:59:27 PM PST by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, geese, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

spew!!!


in your face!


368 posted on 11/10/2006 3:51:56 AM PST by chasio649
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Santourm pissed off his base by...

It's tempting to notch your belt and mark up a kill. But that was a tough state for Santorum to win in no matter what. And the Dims were hungry. And his opponent was a Casey. And there was a national anti-Bush tide.

I think Santorum was a great candidate, made few mistakes, unlike Allen or Burns. But sometimes, you just can't win.
369 posted on 11/10/2006 5:24:30 AM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher
You are right. It wasn't so much Rick Sanatorium or individual Republicans that were being sent a message, it was the limp wristed Republican Party as whole that was targeted.

They ignored their base the Christian Conservatives and other conservatives that give Bush his big second term boost, which they immediately slapped in the face with the Arlen Specter and never stopped slapping them.

Pushing this nightmare amnesty bill and kissing Mexico's Fox boots.

Getting soldiers killed in Iraq fighting terrorists in Iraq while a couple of hundred miles from where they are dying he's pressuring Israel to give up land for state and to arm the same damn people who are killing our soldiers while throwing Ramadan parties in the White House for the "Region of Peace" as he calls them. This is why this so called war on terror especially in Iraq is dragging on.

He can't take his own advice on the terrorists, he can't decide if he is "for them or against them." Also he can't decide if he is President of Mexico or the U.S. or if he is President of all Americans including the middle class or If he is just president of the Chamber of Commerce for Big Business who his justice department is letting price fix and price gouge the American public out of a lot more than that lousy six hundred dollar tax cut.

Then take a look at the debt he's dumping on our children and grandchildren not to fight a war with, they keep shrinking our military, look where the money really goes, to line the pockets of big business who are having to add more pockets to hold it.

He's not only stood by why his friends doubled our cost to get to work, our utility bills and groceries but he's doubled what Washington spends since he got there and he has gotten much help from them so called conservative Republicans in both houses.

This is why they were turned out in the street. We didn't stay at home, real conservatives vote we just fired the jerks that refused to listen to those that elected them and those that just whined and said they couldn't do nothing about it.

Well if you can't fight and do your job, get out! We don't need you.

Here's a word to the dumb ass democrats. You didn't win anything.

Keep your useless liberal crap up and we'll take it right back from you! You better listen to those democrats who run as conservatives.

Here's a tip for both. You had better not pass that insane amnesty bill or we will see you in two years!

370 posted on 11/10/2006 6:43:24 AM PST by mississippi red-neck (You will never win the war on terrorism by fighting it in Iraq and funding it in the West Bank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: chasio649

LOL! Of course, I wasn't serious. Condi has not been effective in persuading the GOP faithful that she could be elected to any office yet.


371 posted on 11/10/2006 6:47:59 AM PST by TommyDale (Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: Aussie Dasher

One word: arrogance. Voters don't like arrogance.


372 posted on 11/10/2006 7:39:52 AM PST by pray4liberty (School District horrors: http://totallyunjust.tripod.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
Condi has not been effective in persuading the GOP faithful that she could be elected to any office yet.

Condi hasn't been successful at much of anything except getting appointed to offices she does a mediocre or poor job at.

No record of solid delivery. No election to office. Pro-choice, pro-affirmative action, has more shoes than Imelda Marcos.

If this is the hope of the right-wing, we're doomed.

A lot of this support for Condi comes down to her being a black woman. It's like hearing a bunch of libs, squishing over their ideal black candidate. For me, her sex and color are irrelevant. Whether she can perform and has conservative policy positions is the only thing I consider. The GOP nomination is not an affirmative action slot and we will not get the black vote by running a black candidate. The Dims have proven they rule the NAACP plantation. And so far, she's completely fails to measure up to a nomination unless your sole criteria is someone who is black and/or female and/or lesbian.
373 posted on 11/10/2006 8:03:25 AM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies]

To: George W. Bush

I agree with you.


374 posted on 11/10/2006 8:04:43 AM PST by TommyDale (Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: Liz

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1735184/posts?page=373#373

(Condi Rice) "...has more shoes than Imelda Marcos."

LOL!


375 posted on 11/10/2006 8:06:12 AM PST by TommyDale (Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Blame the base

I'm not blaming myself. I'm part of the rational base who chooses to vote for a bad republican (or in Santorum's case - a good republican) over communism. Other "conservatives" would rather hurt themselves and everyone else by going with communism over "not perfect."

376 posted on 11/10/2006 10:18:14 AM PST by 69ConvertibleFirebird (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Like I said, some "conservatives" are too whiny and try to force terrible on everyone when good (but flawed = Santorum) isn't perfect. Now we will have no more conservative Supreme Court justices, no border fence, high taxes, and an attempt at a govt. takeover of health care.
377 posted on 11/10/2006 10:21:35 AM PST by 69ConvertibleFirebird (Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: 69ConvertibleFirebird

don't blame the conservatives, if any sat out there were few of them. It's the unaffiliated voter who decides every election, not the registered democrat and not the registered republican, it's those who swing year to year. You should know that. And, as i stated, the elected officials lost due to their lousy voting record.
http://www.theconservativevoice.com/articles/article.html?id=20139 they let down an excited conservative base and many of them sat home. Santorum was to cockey when he backed arlen specter and not toomey. His eyes were on the #2 spot in the Senate and not with his constituents.


378 posted on 11/10/2006 1:14:52 PM PST by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, geese, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 377 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
Yeah, but Imelda has this on her lawn.


379 posted on 11/10/2006 1:46:34 PM PST by Liz (Nearly all men can stand adversity, but to test a man's character, give him power. Abe Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: Liz

LOL! Big enough for those boats that Maureen Dowd calls feet!


380 posted on 11/10/2006 2:53:56 PM PST by TommyDale (Iran President Ahmadinejad is shorter than Tom Daschle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380381-385 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson