Sure. She's a pundit. She has no responsibility for accomplishing anything, so she's free to spout off and be an attention whore, no matter how much damage it does. That's the entirety of the context.
You cited a specific instance to support your view, and now you are running away from a simple request to put that specific instance in context.
Additional inflammatory accusations might be effective rhetoric to some audiences, but I like to think that those on FR are not so impressed.