Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ErnieBert

I'm not sure the article as written is all that misleading.


14 posted on 11/08/2006 11:29:12 AM PST by cycjec (doesn't teach or inspire or compel them to think things throughuuu-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: cycjec
The article is intentionally misleading and an example of why WND is as trustworthy as Air America.

farah conveniently left out the part of the change that requires each applicant to document an on-going process of treatment leading to a complete 'sex-change' procedure.

The concept is despicable but not exactly as Farah chose to describe it.

16 posted on 11/08/2006 11:42:05 AM PST by wtc911 (You can't get there from here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: cycjec

Not misleading? The article is about...

"an imminent action by the New York City Board of Health to permit people born in the city to change the sex recorded on their birth certificates "

and

"Beginning next month, people born in New York will be able to change historical records – permanently."


Now, if the guy wrote the article in 1971, maybe it would make sense. Do people look into stories like this before they post them or just believe it as gospel because of the source??


19 posted on 11/08/2006 12:53:24 PM PST by ErnieBert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson