And, hence, he lost.
Social conservatism that defends LIBERTY (gun freedom, federalism, family values as a moral concept) is still ok.
But social conservatism that restricts freedom and liberty (stem cells, abortion, gay marriage) is not a winner.
Economic conservatism -- low taxes, lower spending -- that should be our focus.
First, we need to be National Defense Conservatives. Second, Economic, small government Conservatives. Third, I'm for Liberty Conservatives within the constructs of some Social Mores and Social Conservatism. Abortion is not my number one issue; nor is the stem cell issue. I just think those are issues which don't have to be addressed by the Federal Government right now. Embryonic stem cell research doesn't work as well as other potential cures. Abortion that becomes infanticide reduces our overall goal of Liberty. I don't think we have to be Carrie Nations about these issues, but I think we can still have our priorities that respect others in the movement who may have different priorities.
Have seen the result in a family friend's daughter. Attending an inner city non performing school. She got the report that the school was put on the 'list'. She has been able to transfer her little girl into a well performing school. The competition for students will eventually force schools to perform better or lost fed funds that closes them down.
If you think that educating the least of us is not worthy spending, then so be it.
My children went to private schools and we didn't worry about their education. Poor inner city parents have neither the funds nor the educational background to see that their children are better educated. Can we care enough to help?