Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HKMk23

Again, I agree with you. But as I stated before the election, the spin many are taking is that the "social" conservatives "lost us" the election.


1,568 posted on 11/08/2006 1:16:30 PM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1563 | View Replies ]


To: redgolum; Quix; bitt
... the spin many are taking is that the "social" conservatives "lost us" the election.

That's to be expected; many want to pretend that there are spheres of life (social, fiscal, spiritual, etc) that are disparate, and that one can uphold conservative principles in one sphere and be more lax in another. The Truth is, that whatever laxity one allows in one "sphere" has its root in an underlying philosophy that rationalizes in favor of such laxity, and that underlying philosophy forms thae basis of behavior in every aspect of one's life. Laxity over here, soon or late, eventuates into laxity over there, and over there, and over there... Those who live under the misconception that our lives are internally segregated in this way truly inhabit a Fool's Paradise and, in so doing, imperil us all with their rationalized concessions to evil.

The remedy is not scorn, nor chastisement, but clarity. People must be shown how this is true; how the roots of their personal social morals trace down to an underlying foundation upon which their whole life's edifice rests. Once that is clearly grasped, it becomes inarguable that compromises in the foundation impact the entire structure, not just selected aspects of it.

So, the solution path must incorporate a great deal of teaching and exhortation; rational appeals on behalf of a more conservative culture. Factually put, we cannot simultaneoulsy embrace the underlying philosophies of The Constitution and MTV, nor can a successful political party attempt such; the clash of opposing philosophies will eventually reduce the whole structure into two piles of rubble.

Wow, that's heavy. What an erie image: Lower Manhattan on 9-11 as a prophetic picture of how the simultaneous embrace of clashing philosophies brings destruction. We tried to simultaneously embrace fiscal conservatism (the WTC towers representing commerce and financial strength) and excuse our lax approach to global terrorism by approaching it as a criminal issue. The simultaneous embrace of the philosphy underlying our financial strngth and the philosophy shilling for our limp-wristed stance on terrorism resulted in a clash between them that darkened the skies over NYC and reverbrates through our hearts and minds to this very moment.

No one should believe for an instant that "big tent" attempts to embrace incompatible philosophies within the GOP will be any less destructive.

1,580 posted on 11/08/2006 1:55:49 PM PST by HKMk23 (PRO-LIFE: Because a Person's a Person, no matter how small.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1568 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson