Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ErnieBert
Why the postmortem?? If you take a look at the results from previous 6th year midterms, the 6 year itch, this was hardly the resounding victory that the Dems seem to think it is. Even if there wasn't a war in iraq, and even if this congress hadnt been the laziest, greediest most venal congress we have ever seen, the 6th year midterm should still see the party in opposition take seats.

You are missing the point. We have lost both houses of Congress. It will not be easy to get them back. From 1933 to 1995, a 62 year period, the Dems controlled the House for 58 of those years and the Senate for 54. We are not going to get back the House in 2008. The power of incumbency is real. It took the Dems 12 years to get back the House.

187 posted on 11/08/2006 8:29:45 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]


To: kabar

"Already the wails of the immigration restrictionists are rising, insisting Republicans lost because they weren't tough on keeping illegal border-crossers out. Not true. The test was in Arizona, where two of the noisiest border hawks, Representatives J.D. Hayworth and Randy Graf, lost House seats. Graf lost in a seat along the Mexican border, where illegal immigrants flock."

Hayworth lost because of Iraq, like every other Republican. I'm so tired of these Weekly Standard bums.


191 posted on 11/08/2006 8:36:40 AM PST by teg_76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

To: kabar
From 1933 to 1995, a 62 year period, the Dems controlled the House for 58 of those years and the Senate for 54.

Keep in mind that the Democrats had overwhelming majorities in Congress for most of that time -- mainly because the party was much more conservative at the time, and because the population of the U.S. was heavily concentrated in Democratic strongholds such as the Northeast and Midwest.

The GOP majority in 1994 wasn't a huge one, and it hasn't varied much in size over the last 12 years. The Democratic majority in the House isn't a huge one, and their Senate majority is as slim as it could possibly be. I suspect there will be a lot of changes in dominance in both houses of Congress over the next couple of decades -- and that's not necessarily a bad thing.

245 posted on 11/09/2006 6:51:52 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson