Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A. Pole
"Are you opposed to the anti-trust laws? Can you provide the reason for yes or no?"

I am opposed to certain parts. For example, IIRC courts have held that concentration within an industry by itself can constitute a violation. That is wrong. If a supplier is just the very best and happens to enjoy that concentration without having broken another law, then the effect of anti-trust law is to harm the best supplier.

Under such a regimen, the less competent are lifted up, and the competent are held down. Buyers are harmed.

That's evil.

50 posted on 11/06/2006 2:26:22 PM PST by Uncle Miltie ("We will slaughter anyone who calls Islam violent!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Brad Cloven
I am opposed to certain parts.

Which parts do you support?

For example, IIRC courts have held that concentration within an industry by itself can constitute a violation. That is wrong.

It "can[not] constitute a violation"?

52 posted on 11/06/2006 2:29:40 PM PST by A. Pole (Sorel: "Nothing, [except ...] gives greater pleasure, than being misunderstood by blunderheads.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson