Skip to comments.
Raytheon Workers on Strike
KOLD news 13 ^
| Nov 5
Posted on 11/05/2006 4:38:48 PM PST by onja
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
This plant makes about a quarter of all the missiles we have. Hopefully the workers will form some sort of agreement.
BTW- Tommorow my dad, an engineer, will be driving fork lifts around. He seems kinda excited; he hasn't done that since he was in college.
1
posted on
11/05/2006 4:38:49 PM PST
by
onja
To: onja
They should be very careful - as the CT Sikorsky workers have found out.
Most of their work is being "offloaded" now.
2
posted on
11/05/2006 4:43:21 PM PST
by
NY.SS-Bar9
(DR #1692 Check your elevation.)
To: onja
Wonder what our troops in Iraq, who need these missles to fight this war think of the wonderful little union goons of Raytheon? Whom would you rather support, our soldiers or these union members?
3
posted on
11/05/2006 4:49:03 PM PST
by
centurion316
(Democrats - Supporting Al Qaida WorldwideA)
To: onja
If Arizona is not a "right to work" state, then perhaps they should move production to a "right to work" state
4
posted on
11/05/2006 4:52:12 PM PST
by
SauronOfMordor
(A planned society is most appealing to those with the arrogance to think they will be the planners)
To: onja
To: onja
Good let these anachronistic bozos strike.
I hope Raytheon takes these jobs and offshores them or sends them to right to work states.
6
posted on
11/05/2006 4:55:31 PM PST
by
eleni121
("Show me just what Mohammed brought:: evil and inhumanity")
To: onja
I see multiple issues and a single cause.
By making free healthcare for every union employee (and extending the union to every floor sweeper and telephone jockey), by making retirement benefits last for half of a person's expected lifespan, by raking the membership for dues to pad the union's employment and leadership, as well as their political contributions, they've created the problems that they complain about.
If the company wisely decided to say, "Hey, employees - here's all the money we're going to dump down the drain for your life insurance, your health insurance, your retirement benefits, your sick leave, your maternity leave, etc. Plus here's what you'd pay in union dues, least from our side. Now, you're empowered to do whatever the heck you want to do with all of that. Want to buy a new car rather than insure yourself and your family? Go for it. It's yours to do with as you please," I doubt there's an employee, once they saw the numbers involved, that wouldn't jump at the chance.
Every form of mandatory service that a company has to buy is inflated. It always will be. There's rarely any competitive bids for insurance contracts, and retirement programs are almost a black art at this point in time.
There was a time when unions were a critical need. That time ended more than fifty years ago, and unions should be banned for any public employee or government contractor.
7
posted on
11/05/2006 4:56:34 PM PST
by
kingu
(No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
To: onja
Where does this figure into a national defense risk? Can the feds step in much as Ronnie did with the striking aircraft controllers back in the 1980s.
8
posted on
11/05/2006 4:59:57 PM PST
by
Cobra64
(Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
To: SauronOfMordor
If Arizona is not a "right to work" state, then perhaps they should move production to a "right to work" state Given that we're in a war, the timing couldn't be worse for such a move.
9
posted on
11/05/2006 5:01:24 PM PST
by
Cobra64
(Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
To: Cobra64
10
posted on
11/05/2006 5:05:32 PM PST
by
TADSLOS
(Mohammed was the L. Ron Hubbard of his time.)
To: TADSLOS
Arizona is a right to work state.
11
posted on
11/05/2006 5:20:04 PM PST
by
sdillard
To: centurion316
The troops probably don't think much of them. Me either. In case you're wondering, I have little sympathy for the strikers especially since they're messing up such a vital industry.
12
posted on
11/05/2006 6:05:21 PM PST
by
onja
("The government of England is a limited mockery.") (France is a complete mockery.)
To: SauronOfMordor
AZ is a right to work state, but Raytheon is a multi-state organization, if they try to bust the union here there will be hell to pay. Pretty much the only way unions survive in AZ is in multi-state companies so they get the support of other union locals.
13
posted on
11/05/2006 6:08:22 PM PST
by
discostu
(we're two of a kind, silence and I)
To: Randy in Arizona
To: onja
striking a defense industry in time of war is an act of treason.
15
posted on
11/05/2006 6:28:17 PM PST
by
balch3
To: Randy in Arizona
Sick, Sick, Sick - couldn't watch after the impaled worker ..
16
posted on
11/05/2006 6:36:34 PM PST
by
11th_VA
To: muffaletaman
Poor Klaus, he must end up as the CEO in the end.......
17
posted on
11/05/2006 6:38:16 PM PST
by
cmsgop
( Try Miracle Grow, with New and Improved Uterus Growing Power, endorsed by Cindy Sheehan)
To: All
If Raytheon plays an important role in America's defense, then the strikers have had a hand in that. They have earned our gratitude and they deserve better from us than the majority here has given them.
To: gas0linealley
What part of helping out the war effort makes extortion honorable? Because that's what a strike is, pure 100% extortion.
19
posted on
11/05/2006 7:07:10 PM PST
by
discostu
(we're two of a kind, silence and I)
To: discostu
When workers strike, some may call it extortion, but what do they call higher profits?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson