Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A. Pole
Nope. And neither do you.

They were not sent to protect Iraqis they were there to protect Kuwaiti oil tankers and keep the Strait of Hormuz open.

I know that you and Saddam have a tendency to think that Kuwaiti is part of Iraq but they are separate countries.

Do you have any more faux-history you would like to pull out?

29 posted on 11/05/2006 1:32:40 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (De inimico non loquaris sed cogites)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: Harmless Teddy Bear
They were not sent to protect Iraqis they were there to protect Kuwaiti oil tankers

Iraq was allowed to put Kuwaiti and other foreign flags on Iraqi tankers.

I will remind you another detail. Do you remember how USS Stark was attacked by Iraq on May 17 1987 what resulted in 37 deaths? Somehow the bias against Iran was so strong that this attack was disregarded. Don't you find this amazing?

Now if the USS Stark was sunk without survivors, how likely is that Iran would be blamed?

32 posted on 11/05/2006 1:50:46 PM PST by A. Pole (Orwell:He who controls the present, controls the past.He who controls the past, controls the future.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson