Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Button on e-voting machine allows multiple votes
Oakland Tribune ^ | 11/01/2006 | Ian Hoffman

Posted on 11/04/2006 2:21:06 PM PST by calcowgirl

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

1 posted on 11/04/2006 2:21:08 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Hmm ... Sounds like Dems are already coming up with far-fetched before-the-fact excuses as to why they're going to lose.


2 posted on 11/04/2006 2:22:57 PM PST by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Oakland based

Sounds like a setup for voter fraud complaints

3 posted on 11/04/2006 2:23:49 PM PST by PatrickF4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

What in the world would a company selling voting machines be thinking, to put an external switch on the machine that could affect the totals. Beeper or not, this is outrageous.


4 posted on 11/04/2006 2:26:12 PM PST by Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
"You can't do it surreptitiously," said Guy Ashley, spokesman for the Alameda County Registrar of Voters. "You have to know what you're doing.

Okay, so here's how you do it...
5 posted on 11/04/2006 2:26:36 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl; MikefromOhio
It's a feature

Not something we really want to hear on a voting machine.....

6 posted on 11/04/2006 2:26:44 PM PST by ARealMothersSonForever (We shall never forget the atrocities of September 11, 2001.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

How many times are dead people allowed to vote? Who is Chavez favoring in the election?


7 posted on 11/04/2006 2:26:51 PM PST by Richard from IL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PatrickF4
If the machine beeps loudly

And if it does not beep loudly, everything is OK?

8 posted on 11/04/2006 2:29:46 PM PST by ARealMothersSonForever (We shall never forget the atrocities of September 11, 2001.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Louisiana has been using electronic voting machines for decades now. If I'm not mistaken, that button is what the attendant presses to enable the next person in line to vote after one person already has. In order for a voter to screw around with that, he would have to literally walk all the way around the machine, right next to where the attendant is, then walk back into the booth and vote again. Unless Helen Keller is working the booth, it's impossible not to get caught.

Hooray, we're ahead of the curve on something!

9 posted on 11/04/2006 2:30:31 PM PST by Gordongekko909 (Mark 5:9)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi
As if this "way behind the machine button" would keep people working together taking advantage of this when they want.

SEQUOIA, the brand owned by Hugo Chavez and used to help him choose our leaders.

10 posted on 11/04/2006 2:31:37 PM PST by dersepp (I Am A Militia Of One)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ARealMothersSonForever

If I were a cheating poll worker, I would set the machine to multiple votes before the polls opened, and then inform all my friends how to vote multiple times. It would really be easy to get hundreds of extra votes.


11 posted on 11/04/2006 2:33:49 PM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dersepp

Is this the company he owns? It would make sense. As far as a 'beeping' sound goes, it would have to be pretty loud in my precinct (Md) for anyone to hear it.


12 posted on 11/04/2006 2:35:35 PM PST by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
On our electionic voting machines you receive a plastic data card that serves as a single ballot. I've never seen a variation on this for an electronic machine. One ballot, one vote. What are they doing in CA?
13 posted on 11/04/2006 2:37:03 PM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
If I were a cheating poll worker

And we all know that THAT has never happened.....

14 posted on 11/04/2006 2:43:10 PM PST by ARealMothersSonForever (We shall never forget the atrocities of September 11, 2001.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ARealMothersSonForever
These voting machines are the most accurate way to count the votes in the history of mankind.

What you are witnessing is a Dem campaign to discredit the machines, and these machines do come close to nonrepudiation.

What they really want is the option to easily manipulate the vote count. What they really want is the old computer punch card ballots.

15 posted on 11/04/2006 2:49:59 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Question: why do we spend hundreds of millions on voting machines that are used one or two days a year?


16 posted on 11/04/2006 2:51:29 PM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

Electronic voting should NEVER be permitted.


17 posted on 11/04/2006 2:52:39 PM PST by Jim Noble (If we can't leave a democracy behind, we should at least leave the corpses of our enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BW2221
why do we spend hundreds of millions on voting machines that are used one or two days a year?

Because the contracts are awarded to a local company, and there are no specific standards in place?

18 posted on 11/04/2006 2:55:04 PM PST by ARealMothersSonForever (We shall never forget the atrocities of September 11, 2001.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

Thats just what I was thinking L0L


19 posted on 11/04/2006 2:59:45 PM PST by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

seriously
despite all of the problems, paper ballots were far harder to tamper with


20 posted on 11/04/2006 3:02:09 PM PST by ChurtleDawg (Go Mike Steele!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson