[Enchante]

"I bet it was the existence of documents such as the one jveritas refers to on this thread that caused certain individuals to enlist the aid of the NYTimes in shutting down internet access to the documents, not the excuse that someone could build an a-bomb from enclosed directions"

Great minds thinking alike..... I've been supposing that it's that and/or that bozos in the IAEA and NY Times, etc. are terrified that if they can't now, finally change the course of the US government there will truly be a reckoning in the next two years. Either way (or for both reasons) the weasels are desperate to try to prevent further revelations. Whether or not many more such docs get onto the web, the weasels are worried that if the Demagogues don't take over Congress then it will finally be time for some serious investigations and hearings in 2007, and the IAEA, UN, EU-drones, and MSM would never survive a full and extensive airing of their perfidy. They have been betraying civilization and humanity in their jihad against the USA.

[CyberAnt]

I have info from a confidential source that the dems (especially the NYT) are terrified of the repubs staying in power because of the national security leaks - which are now being investigated by the DOJ.

If I were the NYT - I'd be worried too - especially after losing another 39% share of the market.

[river rat]

One is usually correct in assuming that when the NYT is irritated -- the irritant is good for America..

No newspapers in the U.S. serve as a better purveyors of the "contrarian" view as the New York Slimes or the San Jose Murky News...

Doing the exact opposite of their recommendation - is usually the correct action.

Semper Fi

[Marine_Uncle]

Your probably right on. Their desperation leads them to get sloppy. But at the same time hope enough people don't connect the dots.
Their dishonor shall catch up to them eventually. Hopefully sooner then later.