nyslimes headline:
NEW YORK TIMES GLUM AS IT STRUGGLES TO HOLD READERSHIP
Our guys are sandbagging the NYT!
Reverse psychology.
Oh I am SOOOOO glum! /wrist
(/sarc)
Tokyo Rose & Lord Haw-Haw rolled into one...
The New York Times is the American version of Al Jazeera. Anyone who subscribes to the New York Times needs to discontinue their subscriptions. The only way to hurt them is to not give them money. The same goes for all the other MSM outlets that slam America and embolden our enemies.
Glum struggles quagmire failed scandal corruption, base deserting end of era stupid cowboy, squandered goodwill isolation low approval global warming, Iraq Iraq Iraq, bad economy rich tax cuts offshore drilling, unions protest aliens hurt poor abused minorities disenfranchised. Oh, and Katrina, you heartless racist Republican bastards. -Your New York Times
Yes, the NYT is glum, glum, glum, glum...
LOL. It's hilarious. Wasn't it just last week they were talking 50?
Spin, spin, spin.
In 2004, my 19 y/o son called me at work on emergency because he heard news on the radio that Kerry was winning huge. He is not active politically, and didn't even want to vote. But when he thought of the possibility of Kerry as pres - he drove straight to the polls and voted. He said the thought was "surreal". If my indifferent son can be spurred to do such a thing, imagine what effect the interested voter will have to this news?
Thats some serious reverse psychology!
I'm not glum! I don't know anyone who shares my political beliefs who is glum. Sounds like the Times is making another effort to disenfranchise conservative voter's. Can we sue??
Gosh I'll have to just change my attitude then!
I'm STILL going to vote AND strait Republican.
Take THAT Mr.(glass half empty) Gaylord!
I don't feel glum at all.
I am not glum by any stretch.
Whatever happens. And I expect good news.
I will oppose dems with the same vigor no matter what happens. Until they are gone.
Not as glum as the NYSlimes will be!
Seems Gaylord is Robin's go to, GOP basher:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/29/politics/29assess.html?ex=1285646400&en=88b946a056158eef&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
Gaylord = turncoat
Glum? I'm laughing my arse off.
My reading of the historic moonphase voting chart predicts a gain of 5 to 8 seats by the Dems.
(Hey, why not a moonphase poll? They're always home!) )
Here's a chart of moon phase and how the outparty does in House seats.
1992 waxing +9
1994 waxing +54
1996 waxing +8
1998 waxing +5
2000 waning +2
2002 waning -8
2004 waning -3
2006 waning
Source: WTF? Correlations Co. Inc.
:-)