Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NonValueAdded

This is a win-win for the Dems. GW is damned because he hasn't done anything. If he had pushed this, I'm sure it would involve airports acquiring new land, right? Then the POTUS would have eminent domain issues hung around his neck, and the could call him "King George."


4 posted on 11/04/2006 9:33:14 AM PST by Clara Lou (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Clara Lou

That's true. Usually adding 1000 feet to a runway involves buying a lot of peoples' properties who don't want to sell. Then Bush would be the evil land grabber. Women and minorities hit hardest! They would say Bush has a "Katrina" runway policy or some such rot.


6 posted on 11/04/2006 9:53:35 AM PST by Sender ("Always tell the truth; then you don't have to remember anything." -Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Clara Lou
I'm sure it would involve airports acquiring new land, right?

With many of the runways in question, physical lengthening would be impossible or impractical.

Resulting in the shortening of the official lenghth of such runways until they met the requirement.

Resulting in the elimination of certain kinds of aircraft from those that could land at that airport.

Resulting in the loss of commercial service, or at least certain flights, from certain airports.

Resulting in "Bush's Fault!" from the JackAsses.

12 posted on 11/04/2006 11:10:18 AM PST by Erasmus (I invited Benoit Mandelbrot to the Shoreline Grill, but he never got there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson