Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xrp

How many of those runways were built during the Bush Administration? Also, while the stat might be accurate, how many of those are super-long runways that, based on the longest takeoff roll of aircraft using the runway, effectively have a 1000 ft or greater safety zone due to their length???


3 posted on 11/04/2006 9:15:54 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Prayers for our patriot brother, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub. Brian, we're all pulling for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NonValueAdded

This is a win-win for the Dems. GW is damned because he hasn't done anything. If he had pushed this, I'm sure it would involve airports acquiring new land, right? Then the POTUS would have eminent domain issues hung around his neck, and the could call him "King George."


4 posted on 11/04/2006 9:33:14 AM PST by Clara Lou (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: NonValueAdded; xrp
Or, perhaps more to the point, when did the 1000' become a requirement?

The article goes on to say "The FAA says it is diligently upgrading the runways. The agency expects that all of them will meet the standard by 2015, when they are legally required to do so, according to FAA spokeswoman Laura Brown. "

How many of those runways were built during the Bush Administration?

20 posted on 11/04/2006 10:12:11 PM PST by Ready4Freddy ("Everyone knows there's a difference between Muslims and terrorists. No one knows what it is, tho...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson