BE HERE, OR BE NOWHERE!
Posted on 11/03/2006 2:40:01 PM PST by Tarkus2040
| Haggard accuser admits to timing allegations to influence election |
||
| Posted by keepitreal On 11/03/2006 5:24:17 PM CST Denver Rocky Mountain News ^ Haggard accuser Michael Jones, according to today's Rocky Mountain News, timed his revelations in order to influence voters in Tuesday's election: "Jones said he had thought about revealing his alleged affair with Haggard months ago but was advised by his attorney that he needed to gather more evidence. He said he decided to come out with his story before the election to influence voters." |
||
Thanks for proving, yet AGAIN, that you don't listen to Savage.
I like your tagline. I heard him say that yesterday and could only think about the trolls on this thread. He calls them demon rats and demon cats and these guys think he is a liberal. makes me laugh.
"That list has been posted every day, and a point-by-point rebuttal has been posted."
Got link?
Or are you making this up?
No kidding.
So what's his position TODAY?
He keeps changing all the time.
I agree the endorsement of Jerry Brown for AG was/is stupid. However, Jerry Brown hasn't paid for advertising on the Savage Nation yet.
And yet he gave the MAX. to Brown.
Don't forget he also was against the Harriet Mier nomination.
Harry Ried and the democrats were for her nomination.
The MAJORITY OF CONSERVATIVES were not.
Because a lot of conservatives spoke up against her nomination, we eventually
got a nominee with a much more conservative record.
gave plenty to the pendleton 8 defense fund also.
Why pay for what you get for free?
"You mean like us folks shocked and appalled by Savage giving money to Moonbeam?"
You mean Bush and the GOP support of Liberal Lieberman, instead of supporting their own GOP man?
10/30 live thread. if you really listened, you would know most of that list is wrong or exagerated. i wont continue to argue, the list has been rebutted, you know that.
Don't worry about this party pooper. (being intentionally kind)
You can CHECK his CHECKered posteing history all you like, but his act was visible shortly after he started posting here.(being intentionally kind)
didn't the publicans refuse to support the ex-minuteman out west who was strong on borders?
The fact that they aren't paying for advertising means they don't believe it's a good use of their money (probably because Savage can say whatever he wants--it's his microphone--but his audience will not pull the level for such a liberal nut case.
Thanks for opening up to us with a civil tone, svcw. I can't say that the Brown donation does not bother me, but I do get a kick out of listening to him. Savage, IMO, is conservative, but I wouldn't say entirely. Then again, I wouldn't consider myself entirely conservative, either. But he is extremely conservative where it counts: Borders, language and culture. Speaking of donations to a Democrat's campaign fund, Bruce Williams (the financial talk show host) stated that he once donated to his rival's campaign. Does that make him a liberal? Certainly not. Or how about the New York Post's (a presumably conservative newspaper) campaign donation and support of Hillary Clinton? I'm not excusing Savage's decision, just pointing out that he's not the only one who has donated to a Democrat's campaign fund.
They are too busy supporting the Check Pants Republicans who demand cheap labor. They give lip-service to the grassroots, but govern for the check Pants Republican.
maybe moonbeam is just a personal friend who he knows will do a good job despite being a liberal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.