Detailed Design of Nuclear Weapons is Available on the Internet ( NYT and IAEA Are Liars)

nuclearweaponarchive.org ^ | November 3rd 2006 | jveritas

[jveritas]

The New York Times and the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) claim that the release of some the Iraqi documents contain sensitive nuclear information on how to build and design a nuclear weapons and it is a breach of security. However there is a website called “nuclearweaponarchive.org” http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Nwfaq/Nfaq4.html that details how to engineer and design a nuclear weapons with equations and diagrams and the whole nine yards. Yet another lies by the IAEA and New York Times has been destroyed a lie that was designed to influence the elections on Tuesday.

Here is the website and a list of all chapters on how to design and make the nuclear bomb. If you click on the link it will take you to the chapters and if you click on the chapters you will get extreme details on how to build the nuclear weapon.

http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Nwfaq/Nfaq4.html

Section 4.0 Engineering and Design of Nuclear Weapons

Version 2.04: 20 February 1999

4.1 Elements of Fission Weapon Design

• 4.1.1 Dimensional and Temporal Scale Factors • 4.1.2 Nuclear Properties of Fissile Materials • 4.1.3 Distribution of Neutron Flux and Energy in

the Core

• 4.1.4 History of a Fission Explosion • 4.1.5 Fission Weapon Efficiency • 4.1.5.1 Efficiency Equations • 4.1.5.2 Effect of Tampers and Reflectors on

Efficiency

• 4.1.5.3 Predetonation • 4.1.6 Methods of Core Assembly • 4.1.6.1 Gun Assembly • 4.1.6.2 Implosion Assembly • 4.1.6.3 Hybrid Assembly Techniques • 4.1.7 Nuclear Design Principles • 4.1.7.1 Fissionable Materials • 4.1.7.2 Composite Cores • 4.1.7.3 Tampers and Reflectors • 4.1.8 Fission Initiation Techniques • 4.1.9 Testing • 4.2 Fission Weapon Designs • 4.2.1 Low Technology Designs • 4.2.2 High Efficiency Weapons • 4.2.3 Low Yield Weapons • 4.2.4 High Yield Weapons • 4.2.5 Special Purpose Applications • 4.2.6 Weapon Design and Clandestine

Proliferation

• 4.3 Fission-Fusion Hybrid Weapons • 4.3.1 Fusion Boosted Fission Weapons • 4.3.2 Neutron Bombs ("Enhanced Radiation Weapons") • 4.3.3 The Alarm Clock/Layer Cake Design • 4.4 Elements of Thermonuclear Weapon Design • 4.4.1 Development of Thermonuclear Weapon

Concepts

• 4.4.2 Schematic of a Thermonuclear Device • 4.4.3 Radiation Implosion • 4.4.3.1 The Role of Radiation • 4.4.3.2 Opacity of Materials in Thermonuclear

Design

• 4.4.3.3 The Ablation Process • 4.4.3.4 Principles of Compression • 4.4.3.5 Ignition • 4.4.3.6 Burn and Disassembly • 4.4.4 Implosion Systems • 4.4.5 Fusion Stage Nuclear Physics and Design • 4.4.5.1 Fusionable Isotopes • 4.4.5.2 Neutronic Reactions • 4.4.5.3 Fusion Fuels • 4.4.5.4 Fusion Tampers • 4.5 Thermonuclear Weapon Designs • 4.5.1 Principle Design Types • 4.5.2 "Dirty" and "Clean" Weapons • 4.5.3 Maximum Yield/Weight Ratio • 4.5.4 Minimum Residual Radiation (MRR or "Clean") Designs • 4.5.5 Radiological Weapon Designs • 4.6 Weapon System Design • 4.6.1 Weapon Safety • 4.6.2 Variable Yield Designs • 4.6.3 Other Modern Features • 4.7 Speculative Weapon Designs • 4.8 Simulation and Testing

[jveritas]

Ping.

[COEXERJ145]

Designing nuclear weapons is not difficult, especially uranium gun ones. The physics behind the concept is extremely simple and impossible to keep a secret.

Heck, go to the national archives and you can look at the entire blue print for the U.S. Mark-III atomic bomb except for the trigger which is still classified.

[Chena]

Well, well, well. Why am I not surprised? Maybe because I'm not a DUmmy. LOL Thank you, jveritas! BTTT!!

[pissant]

You are a man among boys, Mr. J. Thank you AGAIN, for doing such great work. Hats off.

ANd yes, as soon as I saw Drudge yesterday claim that the Times was doing an article about Iraqs nuclear program, I stated here that thaey would do everything possible to make it anti-Bush. Commie bastards.

[tiredoflaundry]

You rock!!!

[OpusatFR]

So, did the NYT go to google to bid on plutonium or is that still hard to come by?

[doug from upland]

The president needs to hold a news conference and clear this up right now!

[No Longer Free State]

Who cares? The Republicans should launch a concerted effort on every talk show this weekend for FINALLY recognizing and publishing their first article regarding Saddam Hussein's ongoing WMD programs that were, indeed, ended by our invasion of Iraq.

They should also publicly ask the NYT why they are suddenly taking an interest in preventing information harmful to the US is getting into the public domain.

Finally, they should ask democrats why they suppressed the information proving Hussein was a WMD threat in the first place.

[jveritas]

Agree 100% that is why we need to expose this BS and lies of the New York Times and the IAEA who are telling us that somehow a document showing information about Saddam nuclear program is the end of the world as we know it.

[maryz]

I'd heard there were such sites (and that the same information has been available in books for some years -- the only hard part is getting the plutonium or whatever), but just out of curiosity, who owns that site?

[tobyhill]

Incredible that through their lies they prove what has been claimed all along.

[COEXERJ145]

The Nuclear Weapon Archive has been around for years. Nothing they have on it is illegal or classified.

[jveritas]

Agree.

[Bahbah]

You've become a national treasure :)

[rjp2005]

When I read such technical information, it is absolute proof to me that people are born with unique and differing gifts - and that understanding physics or such technical detail is way beyond me and impossible for my brain lol.

[jveritas]

What else do we expect from the New York Times. By the way I talked to Bill Boader today from the NYT and the author of this today article about Saddam nuclear program. I told him about the many other documents that show Saddam was working on re-constructing his nuclear program. He asked me to e-mail him the documents that show this, I did. He replied "interesting".

[maryz]

I didn't think it was illegal or anything. Is it a government agency, a scientific group or what exactly? Just curious.

[Mo1]

Since the NYT's is now so concerned about nuclear weapons and a breach of security

Does this mean they will start to report on Clinton's Chinagate ??

[TexasPatriot8]

Excellent. :) Where are all the libs saying Iraq had no WMD and no nukes? :) Heheheheh. ;)