Posted on 11/03/2006 10:21:47 AM PST by WBL 1952
From Michael Malkin's blog: Hoekstra's response to NYT admitting Saddam was apparently a very dangerous man.
Michael?
Did something come out about one of my favorites that I haven't heard yet? I mean, I know that the Dhimmicrats are throwing everything they have at us, but really! <gdra>
(grinning, ducking and running away)
To your attention
Notice how the MSM handled the NYT screw up?
NOT A WORD!
Typical. Allowing this out would destroy the Party of Treason.
Thx 4 the ping.
NYT's trial balloon made of lead!
Right!
Both shows had a segment,...Gibson's was mostly an ad lib....he gets it..
Angle in for Britt didn't do anything with it on the roundtable.
Gibson was ALL OVER IT...during his radio talk show last night.
He kept begging for callers that would call and try to make a case NOW, that we shouldn't have gone into Iraq...
Believe it or not...they lined up....but, Gibson just shot them all down like ducks at a carnival...
It was a fun show to listen to.
I posted this .....Condi gets it:
Web site’s demise revives dispute ~Hussein’s nuclear program files ...shows... threat from Iraq.
I don't think that would be worth the effort - it is better to use them to find out who the leakers are in the government. The NYT is making itself obsolete and irrelevant. Let them continue - the more biased they look the more credibility they lose. Pretty soon they will be known as the New York Joke.
I was waiting for O'Reilly to say something about the revelation in the NYT, because he made such a big deal of the fact that they didn't find them. He has been a Bush basher ever since.
Trouble is, the NYSlimes will never be held for treason, they will just get another finger tap on the wrist and they will print another secret as soon as they get it. NOTHING will be done to them, or the perrson leaking the secrets.
To bad so few care or pay attention outside of political junkies like us.
I know that is right...too many only look at headlines, or listen to the top of the hour news on the radio...
It gets pretty scary when any serious subject is attempted to be discussed by most people. Ignorance is neck deep for huge numbers and we know exactly how they vote.
What proves your point, IMHO...is that even though we have had more and more articles and books written in the last few years about how dangerous the radical Islamicist are...
and we even have their own words in a confiscated message...saying that they are in Iraq to continue their jihad against us...
The percentage of Americans that are backing the war, is going down steadily...
I THINK that is more due to the constant MSM and dem induced propaganda not only about how we are going to lose, the whole country is a powderkeg....but, that "more Americans are against the war"..
IOW...by saying more are against it, over and over, it makes more against it..."the herd mentality".
BUT, that doesn't make our enemies any LESS dangerous..or any less likely to start suicide bombings or worse over here..
NO...what works IS what the dems and MSM wants least!
They should have 4 catagories for a voter....Democrat, Republican, Independent and Lemming.
Any understanding of the war is missing if one does not realize that our losses have been miniscule by historic standards. We lost twice as many Marines on Iwo Jima taking a small island than we have lost in THREE years in Iraq.
If this nation has become so feminized that it will not defend itself then its days are truly numbered. I cannot believe that is the case despite the best efforts of the Treason Media.
It is not unique to this times. Grant complained that General Lee could find his plans in the NY Times. It routinely covered for the Stalinist regime during the thirties and later always attacking all who tried to fight it. And don't even get me started on China and Vietnam.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.