Skip to comments.
N.J. Rep. Holt Questions Military's Voting System
AP via FoxNEWS ^
| Thursday, November 02, 2006
| AP
Posted on 11/03/2006 5:40:32 AM PST by gridlock
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
To: gridlock
"no one is served by introducing possibilities for error, insecurity, and fraud."
And yet this dips#!t opposes voter ID? Hypocrite.
41
posted on
11/03/2006 10:38:23 AM PST
by
BJClinton
(Celebrate diversity: re-elect Congressman Foley!)
To: gridlock
Democratic Rep. Rush Holt The dems will do anything to suppress the military vote. Just as they did here in Florida in 2000. Won't work this time. By the way, thank you Jon (outhouse) Carry for mobilizing the Republicans and the military.
42
posted on
11/03/2006 10:45:19 AM PST
by
Road Warrior ‘04
(Kill 'em til they're dead! Then, kill 'em again!)
To: gridlock
All one must do to unmask the Marxists posing as Democrats - is to get them TALKING.
Democrats can't explain a number of things they have become known for leading the effort:
1. To open borders to illegal immigration.
2. To grant full welfare/education/health care for illegal immigrants.
3. To fight any law seeking to prevent illegals from voting.
4. To fight any effort to smooth and insure the receipt and counting of Military votes.
5. To justify the existence of the "Congressional Black Caucus".
6. To weaken our security by fighting surveillance of the enemy, incarceration of the enemy, interrogation of the enemy and destruction of the enemy..
7. To focus on the inane bullshit, and pressure the media to ignore the significant...
For some time now -- I've come to view the Democrat party as the Enemy Within -- for they have surely decided that he survival of America is their greatest fear, and that the Republican Party is THEIR enemy - not the threats to our Republic from our Islamist or Communist enemy.
VOTE FOLKS -- Even our dumbest and most corrupt Republican is preferable to granting the Democrats ANY power in Congress.
At least if the Republicans remain a healthy majority - pressure can be brought to rid the party of the assholes...
One primary reason they have tolerated the RINOs and ASSHOLES so long - could have been the fact the margin of majority was TOO SLIM..
VOTE.
Semper Fi
43
posted on
11/03/2006 11:01:50 AM PST
by
river rat
(You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: gridlock
The bad news is that I am in his district.
The good news is that I am voting on Tuesday.
44
posted on
11/03/2006 11:46:58 AM PST
by
MrNJ
To: Westbrook
Let me see if I've got this right. Allowing military men to vote by absentee ballot is "full of security holes" but allowing illegals and dead people to vote is not. It gets better. Apparently, to access the military secure network, the soldiers have to use a special photo ID card with a chip in it.
So, we have a situation where the ACLU is running around the country trying to stop photo IDs for voting at the polls, but the military has to use a photo ID to vote.
-PJ
To: gridlock
Every time you hand your credit card ot a $6/hr clerk to scan, you are exposing yourself to great risks. Would the Congressman attempt to stop us from doing that, too? Hmmm?
46
posted on
11/03/2006 12:59:13 PM PST
by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
To: gridlock
"Congressman Rush Holt (D-NJ) is trying to keep military personnel overseas from voting. He is not going to succeed, but it is telling that he is trying. "
ABSOLUTELY RIGHT!
Demoncrats in general don't want to risk having the military vote for conservatives. In general the LEFT is too cowardly to fight for anyone. They prefer to ONLY think of themselves.
47
posted on
11/03/2006 1:32:13 PM PST
by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
To: gridlock
yeah, this POS really is worried about identity theft against the military.
To: miss marmelstein
and close it should. NJ elects representatives who loathe the military, close all their damn bases I say.
To: gridlock
I don't know this jitbag, but I know Kerry, and Kerry definitely hates us.
It's an article of faith among Democrats that soldiers are stupid, but sly and cunning and need to be kept away from the firewater and ballot box lest they do something dangerous.
Condescending people never realise how perfectly their condescension comes through, even to us poor sufferers who did not get the benefit (?) of an Ivy League union-card. (If Kerry is a typical example of Yale output, it can scarcely be called an "education.")
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
50
posted on
11/03/2006 3:15:11 PM PST
by
Criminal Number 18F
(Build more lampposts... we've got plenty of traitors.)
To: gridlock
Holt must believe our troops are too stupid to vote.
To: oceanview
yeah, this POS really is worried about identity theft against the military. No, he is, really... no, seriously... stop laughing, blast it!... he is very concerned that this secure electronic voting system will make it harder for his ACORN pals to steal military voters' IDs.
For the person that mentioned it, yes, you need to use your CAC or ID card in a reader to log into any military computer, and sometimes a fingerprint reader too... and that's the nonsecure NIPRNET.
d.o.l.
Criminal Number 18F
52
posted on
11/03/2006 3:33:54 PM PST
by
Criminal Number 18F
(Build more lampposts... we've got plenty of traitors.)
To: gridlock
The Rats don't ever quit trying to keep the military from voting. During Clinton's reign the military sometimes didn't even get ballots and if they did they weren't returned on time. In 2000 a lot of military ballots were disqualified for dumb reasons.
To: gridlock
A New Jersey congressman raised questions Thursday about a new military voting program that lets service members request and submit their ballots by fax or e-mail. He's concerned because the votes can't be separated and thrown away before counting like the old paper system.
54
posted on
11/03/2006 4:29:36 PM PST
by
Excuse_My_Bellicosity
("A litany of complaints is not a plan." - GW Bush, referring to DNC's lack of a platform on ANYTHING)
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
I really do believe the Democrats will do whatever it takes to win. They know better than the voters, and certainly better than the Republicans. If they have to dump a lot of votes in the garbage to make the result come out right, that's just what they have to do.
The result is just too important to leave up to the voters.
55
posted on
11/03/2006 4:41:12 PM PST
by
gridlock
(The GOP will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
To: gridlock
Dems have really gone off the deep end.. is there not a low which they will not sink to?
56
posted on
11/03/2006 7:37:09 PM PST
by
Cinnamon
To: Cinnamon
is there not a low which they will not sink to? Ummmm...
Let me think about that for a minute...
Ummmmm.... No.
57
posted on
11/03/2006 7:46:18 PM PST
by
gridlock
(The GOP will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
To: gridlock
"...I'm angry and astonished that they're doing it again without review, scrutiny, and oversight," said Holt."
I.e., You haven't given us a fair chance to develop ways to steal the votes of the overseas servicemen.
58
posted on
11/03/2006 7:57:35 PM PST
by
Rembrandt
(We would have won Viet Nam w/o Dim interference.)
Comment #59 Removed by Moderator
To: conservative blonde
In 2000 a lot of military ballots were disqualified for dumb reasons being Bush votes.
60
posted on
11/05/2006 11:46:08 PM PST
by
cardinal4
(Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi..)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson