Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Group: Lab breach bigger than thought [Los Alamos]
News & Observer ^ | 11/02/06 | Deborah Baker

Posted on 11/03/2006 3:59:46 AM PST by Donna Lee Nardo

Group: Lab breach bigger than thought

By Deborah Baker, Associated Press Writer 11/2/06

SANTA FE, N.M. (AP) - A former nuclear weapons lab contract worker took home not only classified information on a portable computer storage drive, but also about 200 pages of printed documents, her lawyer said Thursday.

The confirmation of the papers follows a watchdog group's report that an internal memo from the Los Alamos National Laboratory indicates the amount of classified information found at the woman's home is substantially larger than first thought.

Nuclear Watch New Mexico, an activist organization, reported that the memo appeared to be a summary of a briefing on the security breach, though the group said it could not verify the memo's authenticity.

Two officials with the federal agency that oversees the nation's nuclear weapons program said there were "significant errors" in the memo but did not reject it outright. The officials, who work for the Energy Department's National Nuclear Security Administration, spoke anonymously because of the ongoing investigation into the breach.

They said they could not confirm the briefing referred to by the author of the memo, which Nuclear Watch said it obtained through an intermediary.

"If true, this summary indicates that a very serious and compromising breach has occurred; perhaps the most serious" in the troubled lab's history, Nuclear Watch said in a news release.

Police seized three portable computer storage drives - called flash drives, among other names - and the papers Oct. 17 during a drug raid at the home of Jessica Quintana, the contract worker.

Quintana has not been charged. A man who was renting a room at her home was jailed on drug and probation charges.

Her lawyer, Stephen Aarons, told The Associated Press that the material included copies of front pages of various documents from the lab. Quintana, an archivist, had planned to use them to create an index of items she had converted to an electronic format, he said.

Aarons also said that one of the three portable computer storage drives contained lab-related material, but that the information wasn't transferred to another computer.

"It was downloaded, but it was never uploaded," Aarons said, adding that Quintana did not show the material to anyone.

The 22-year-old archivist took the material home in August because she faced a work deadline to create the index, then forgot about the documents, he said.

"Her intent was to destroy the hard copies, and she never did it," Aarons said.

Nuclear Watch said the memo on the security briefing at the lab said Quintana had a level of security clearance that would have given her access to documents that could have contained information on how to bypass the authorization process for using nuclear weapons.

"She doesn't know anything about nuclear weapons," Aarons responded. "She knows how to scan documents."

The Energy Department and the Nuclear Security Administration declined Thursday to discuss the scope of the security breach, citing the investigation.

But an official with knowledge of the government probe acknowledged there were "several hundred" pages of classified documents discovered during the drug raid in addition to the classified material found in three computer "thumb" storage devices.

"It is a sizable amount," said the individual, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the investigation is under way. He declined to characterize the documents and said the exact number had not been determined.

Said Energy Department spokesman Craig Stevens: "We're taking it (the security breach) very seriously." He added that Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman "was personally disturbed" that classified documents turned up during a drug raid.

"We want to know how this could happen," Stevens said.

---

Associated Press writer H. Josef Hebert in Washington contributed to this report.

© Copyright 2006, The News & Observer Publishing Company,


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: classifieddocs; losalamos; nukes; weaponry
22 years old and this careless archivist had clearance for materials that "could have contained information on how to bypass the authorization process for using nuclear weapons." That's if this article is accurate.

No one is running Los Alamos.

1 posted on 11/03/2006 3:59:48 AM PST by Donna Lee Nardo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nw_arizona_granny

Ruth, thanks for the ping on this one. We are getting more details and it isn't pretty.


2 posted on 11/03/2006 4:00:55 AM PST by Donna Lee Nardo (DEATH TO ISLAMIC TERRORISTS AND ANIMAL AND CHILD ABUSERS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donna Lee Nardo
Safe prediction: There will be another incident at Los Alamos in 2007, and the headline will again be: "Lab breach bigger than thought".

These guys just don't learn.

3 posted on 11/03/2006 4:05:21 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (The broken wall, the burning roof and tower. And Agamemnon dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donna Lee Nardo
Reports from a couple of years ago indicate a number of Chinese nationals work at the Los Alamos lab.

Why don't we just move the operation to China and give our entire nuclear weapons operation over to the Chinese? They have access to all of our nuclear secrets. Why not just outsource our nuclear work to China as we have everything else?

4 posted on 11/03/2006 4:13:34 AM PST by NoControllingLegalAuthority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donna Lee Nardo

I am sorry, you don't just happen to have so much classified material in your home by accident. This woman should be charged as a spy, regardless of why the material was in her home.

Make and example, don't just brush this under the table.


5 posted on 11/03/2006 4:24:00 AM PST by DaiHuy (I have never seen a situation so dismal that a policeman couldn't make it worse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donna Lee Nardo

I know this is changing the subject, but have the Clintons finished decorating their vacation house outside Beijing?


6 posted on 11/03/2006 4:24:13 AM PST by Savage Beast ("We can either fight the Democrats at the polls or...fight terrorists in our streets." ~jmaroneps37)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donna Lee Nardo

I know this is changing the subject, but have the Clintons finished decorating their vacation house outside Beijing?


7 posted on 11/03/2006 4:24:16 AM PST by Savage Beast ("We can either fight the Democrats at the polls or...fight terrorists in our streets." ~jmaroneps37)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donna Lee Nardo

I know this is changing the subject, but have the Clintons finished decorating their vacation house outside Beijing?


8 posted on 11/03/2006 4:24:28 AM PST by Savage Beast ("We can either fight the Democrats at the polls or...fight terrorists in our streets." ~jmaroneps37)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donna Lee Nardo
How many of the people involved in management and security were there for the last security fiasco? The one(s) before that?
It's obvious that the same "type" of people, if not the exact same people are still running the asylum...

First things first...
Get rid of everybody at the top..
Take Los Alamos out of the hands of the agency presently in charge..
Totally replace security..

There should be severe penalties in place for such security breaches..
Make sure those penalties are applied.. ( I hope it involves prison time.. )

If there are Not penalties in place,.... Why the H**l not???

9 posted on 11/03/2006 4:25:49 AM PST by Drammach (Freedom... Not just a job, it's an adventure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donna Lee Nardo

This is just unacceptable. How many times have the U.S. citizens been promised each and every time that something like this will never happen again and then nothing was ever done to the people who broke the law. I want the axe to fall on them. I want the maximum penalty to befall them and I would like to see the same thing happen who let this go on and not take the steps that are suppose to be taken. All this is nothing but laziness on those who are suppose to not let this happen.


10 posted on 11/03/2006 4:27:32 AM PST by AIC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donna Lee Nardo

took the docs home to archive them, and then forgot about them.


Yeah. I believe that. /sarc


11 posted on 11/03/2006 4:39:53 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donna Lee Nardo
Aarons also said that one of the three portable computer storage drives contained lab-related material, but that the information wasn't transferred to another computer.

"It was downloaded, but it was never uploaded," Aarons said, adding that Quintana did not show the material to anyone.


Doesn't matter since the material wasn't in the proper secure location.

"Her intent was to destroy the hard copies, and she never did it," Aarons said.

There is a procedure for doing and documenting the destruction in a secure location.

Nuclear Watch said the memo on the security briefing at the lab said Quintana had a level of security clearance that would have given her access to documents that could have contained information on how to bypass the authorization process for using nuclear weapons.

"She doesn't know anything about nuclear weapons," Aarons responded. "She knows how to scan documents."


I don't care if she knows how to make straw into gold. If she had access to these documents, she was informed (at least yearly) on how to handle them. She was also informed as to the consequences of not following the procedures.
12 posted on 11/03/2006 5:01:58 AM PST by Lord Basil (Hate isn't a family value; it's a liberal one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donna Lee Nardo

What the hell does a university know about security, anyway? Universities are almost totally open environments. Who the hell is making these decisions? Good grief!!


13 posted on 11/03/2006 11:00:32 AM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Vote REPUBLICAN on November 7th!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donna Lee Nardo

Chi Coms, maybe?


14 posted on 11/03/2006 11:02:37 AM PST by zerosix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Donna Lee Nardo

Security at this facility is constantly being breached. No one has taken security seriously and the whole security mindset is sloppy and ignored. The only way they are going to take security seriously is to completely close the facility, fire everyone and solicit new employees to start in 6 months.

The contract should be given to another organization and new employees be hammered with security procedures and periodic lie detector tests.


15 posted on 11/03/2006 11:31:01 AM PST by Joan Kerrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaiHuy

Make and example, don't just brush this under the table.

The best example is to close the facility and start over in 6 months; new hires, new procedures, new organization who gets a new contract, lie detector tests routinely given and double the security personnel and procedures.
No one is going to take security seriously unless they are personally affected negatively. Fire the whole bunch.


16 posted on 11/03/2006 11:33:46 AM PST by Joan Kerrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

I know this is changing the subject, but have the Clintons finished decorating their vacation house outside Beijing?

Clinton has not delivered the final documents as agreed to.
Sandy Berger's difficulties delayed everything.


17 posted on 11/03/2006 11:35:30 AM PST by Joan Kerrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson