[CedarDave]

What is important in this whole issue is that the New York Times has ridiculed these documents all along and never payed attention to them including the very important documents that show Saddam regime never stopped its programs related to WMD including nuclear programs. These documents were translated and posted here on FR.

[Rocko]

What is important in this whole issue is that the New York Times has ridiculed these documents all along and never payed attention to them including the very important documents that show Saddam regime never stopped its programs related to WMD including nuclear programs.

Gee -- who would have guessed the chances that the Dems would give the GOP two "October" surprises in the same week?

[Shelayne]

What is important in this whole issue is that the New York Times has ridiculed these documents all along and never payed attention to them including the very important documents that show Saddam regime never stopped its programs related to WMD including nuclear programs. These documents were translated and posted here on FR.

The NYTimes just gave credibility to all of the documents that Joseph translated here on FR! And there are some HUGE discoveries--like the March 11(?)2001 document that called out Iraqi Pilots for suicide missions against American interests!

The NYTimes hoped they opened a can of worms in their zeal to "get Bush", instead they seem to have opened a can of "whoop a**"--Bush style.

They are going to wish they never printed their story. No matter how badly their missive was worded, the perception will be "Saddam Hussein had nuclear weapons" and the NYTimes is verifying it. John and Jane Q. Public aren't going to get into the complexities of the argument, they are going to see that Saddam had the "blueprints", our troops captured them, they were put on the internet, and they are real and dangerous, but bottom line will be: "Saddam could have a nuke within a year."

What a November Surprise!