JVERITAS Responds to the 11/3 NYT Article Regarding Iraq Nuclear Program.

November 3rd 2006 | jveritas

[jveritas]

The New York Times article to be published on November 3rd 2006 is about the US putting some captured Iraqi documents on the Foreign Military Intelligence Office (FMSO) website that talks about what the NYT and the IAEA call sensitive information from Iraq 1996 "Full, Final, and Complete Declaration FFCD presented to the UN and IAEA in 1996 and that talks about Iraq nuclear clandestine program. The IAEA and the New York Times claim that Iran may be using some of the technology in this FFCD which is a laughable idea as shown below.

That is from the IAEA website regardinf their report on Iraq FFCD presented to them by the Iraqis in 1996: “ 3. On 7 September 1996 in Baghdad Iraq delivered what it considered to be the definitive version of the "Full, Final, and Complete Declaration" (FFCD-F) of the Iraqi clandestine nuclear programme. The IAEA with the assistance of technical experts from Member States undertook a comprehensive review of the document.” Link: http://www.iaea.org/About/Policy/GC/GC41/Documents/gc41-20.html

So the FFCD was discussed with member states experts of the IAEA. There are 142 members in the IAEA including Iran. I am not saying that the IAEA discussed the Iraqi FFCD with Iranians but the FFCD was not such a secret document and the Iranians would have been able to access it in one way or another if it really provide them with any useful information.

What is important in this whole issue is that the New York Times has ridiculed these documents all along and never payed attention to them including the very important documents that show Saddam regime never stopped its programs related to WMD including nuclear programs. These documents were translated and posted here on FR.

On the subject of nuclear program, I translated and posted a document last month dated January 2001 that shows with a shadow of doubt that Saddam was personally involved with his nuclear scientist to re-build the nuclear program. In this document it states that Saddam personally approved his Iraqi Atomic Energy Agency to re-use nuclear equipments that include something called “Degussa Furnaces” that were used in the previous and prohibited Iraq nuclear program. These furnaces can be used to melt uranium and other nuclear related activities. The Degussa Vacuum furnaces were supplied to Iraq in the 1980’s by a German firm (Degussa AG based in Frankfurt Germany) and these furnaces later on became the subject of investigations of the German firm in the early 1990’s where the company claimed that they did not know that Iraq would have used them in its nuclear program.

The New York Times had an article in 1998 titled “An Iraqi Defector Warns of Iraq's Nuclear Weapons Research” where the Degussa furnaces were mentioned as part of “previous” Iraq nuclear program and the controversy surrounding the sale of these furnaces and the investigations later on(link: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~sanders/214/other/news/iraqi_defector.html ). The irony is that this is not only a New York Times article but also it was written by JUDITH MILLER and JAMES RISEN once of the worst accusers (liars) that the Bush administration lied about Iraq WMD. Where are you Scott Shane????

Link to the translated document on FR: 2001 Iraqi Document: Saddam Approved the Re-Use of Nuclear Equipment http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1725141/posts

Moreover, there are documents dated 1999-2001 that talk about Saddam regime projects to re-build some of the nuclear program facilities like RWTS (Radioactive Waste Treatment Station) and Radio-Chemistry laboratories which were part of Iraq previous clandestine nuclear program. Link to the translated document on FR: Iraqi Documents: Projects to Rebuild Saddam Nuclear Facilities http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1718125/posts .

Also this one

Iraqi Documents Show Plans for Prohibited Nuclear Projects http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1709390/posts

[jveritas]

The truth is on our side, we will win.

[Cindy]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=prewardocs

Adding to post no. 291:

---

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1732378/posts

---

J Veritas, also notice the comments here:

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=23217_The_NYT-IAEA_Conspiracy

Saturday, November 04, 2006

"The NYT/IAEA Conspiracy"

[Cindy]

Adding to post no. 502:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=prewardocs

---

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1730468/posts?page=193#193

Thanks to JVeritas for this thread and translation.

Note: The following post is a quote:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1732298/posts


Iraqi Document: Saddam Regime Spying on the IAEA (Congressman Hoekstra is Right) (Translation)
Pentagon/FMSO website for Iraq Pre-war documents http://70.168.46.200/ ^ | November 4 2006 | jveritas

Posted on 11/04/2006 11:31:34 AM PST by jveritas

[Salem]

in case you missed it.

FReeper jveritas still rattin' out Saddam—and his cohorts at the NYT.

---

AMERICA AT WAR
At Salem the Soldier's Homepage ~
Honored member of FReeper Leapfrog's "Enemy of Islam" list.
Islam, a Religion of Peace®? Some links...  by backhoe
Translated Pre-War IRAQ Documents  by jveritas
Mohammed, The Mad Poet Quoted....  by PsyOp
"PLAES DO NOT TOCH THE WAR"  by AnnaZ
One FReeper On The Line  by SNOWFLAKE
The Clash of Ideologies - A Review

"...It's time we recognized the nature of the conflict. It's total war and we are all involved. Nobody on our side is exempted because of age, gender, or handicap. The Islamofacists have stolen childhood from the world." [FReeper Retief]

"...That the totalitarian force pitted against freedom wears a religious makes this civil war among mankind all the more difficult to engage. Loving freedom as we do, it seems reprehensible to deliberate against a religion. But this is no ordinary religion as it demands absolute obedience of all to their religion at the cost of freedom itself." [FReeper Backtothestreets]

[SevenofNine]

Keep it up jveritas

[netmilsmom]

Great Job!

[silverleaf]

ping

[bwteim]

You're welcome. Thank YOU for your work.

[Steve Van Doorn]

From Wikipedia:
” information regarding nuclear weapon design prior to the 1991 Persian Gulf war.” Why is Wikipedia giving bad information?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Iraqi_Freedom_documents

[bvw]

Wikipedia is not under oath nor even under cross-examination. The masters of Wiki are those with no other way to express "truth" except by sticking to the "truth" framework they'd like. If the truth is different, damn it to wiki-oblivion -- that is the driving force that motivates many a wiki-master. The need to enforce a "truth".

[Steve Van Doorn]

But this is not factual information.
Isn’t this like stating the nuclear weapons little boy and fat man where made 10 years earlier then they where. It is just factually inaccurate.

[Steve Van Doorn]

What happened to jveritas?