Posted on 11/02/2006 8:48:45 PM PST by jveritas
Edited on 11/02/2006 11:06:31 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
The New York Times article to be published on November 3rd 2006 is about the US putting some captured Iraqi documents on the Foreign Military Intelligence Office (FMSO) website that talks about what the NYT and the IAEA call sensitive information from Iraq 1996 "Full, Final, and Complete Declaration FFCD presented to the UN and IAEA in 1996 and that talks about Iraq nuclear clandestine program. The IAEA and the New York Times claim that Iran may be using some of the technology in this FFCD which is a laughable idea as shown below.
That is from the IAEA website regardinf their report on Iraq FFCD presented to them by the Iraqis in 1996: 3. On 7 September 1996 in Baghdad Iraq delivered what it considered to be the definitive version of the "Full, Final, and Complete Declaration" (FFCD-F) of the Iraqi clandestine nuclear programme. The IAEA with the assistance of technical experts from Member States undertook a comprehensive review of the document. Link: http://www.iaea.org/About/Policy/GC/GC41/Documents/gc41-20.html
So the FFCD was discussed with member states experts of the IAEA. There are 142 members in the IAEA including Iran. I am not saying that the IAEA discussed the Iraqi FFCD with Iranians but the FFCD was not such a secret document and the Iranians would have been able to access it in one way or another if it really provide them with any useful information.
What is important in this whole issue is that the New York Times has ridiculed these documents all along and never payed attention to them including the very important documents that show Saddam regime never stopped its programs related to WMD including nuclear programs. These documents were translated and posted here on FR.
On the subject of nuclear program, I translated and posted a document last month dated January 2001 that shows with a shadow of doubt that Saddam was personally involved with his nuclear scientist to re-build the nuclear program. In this document it states that Saddam personally approved his Iraqi Atomic Energy Agency to re-use nuclear equipments that include something called Degussa Furnaces that were used in the previous and prohibited Iraq nuclear program. These furnaces can be used to melt uranium and other nuclear related activities. The Degussa Vacuum furnaces were supplied to Iraq in the 1980s by a German firm (Degussa AG based in Frankfurt Germany) and these furnaces later on became the subject of investigations of the German firm in the early 1990s where the company claimed that they did not know that Iraq would have used them in its nuclear program.
The New York Times had an article in 1998 titled An Iraqi Defector Warns of Iraq's Nuclear Weapons Research where the Degussa furnaces were mentioned as part of previous Iraq nuclear program and the controversy surrounding the sale of these furnaces and the investigations later on(link: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~sanders/214/other/news/iraqi_defector.html ). The irony is that this is not only a New York Times article but also it was written by JUDITH MILLER and JAMES RISEN once of the worst accusers (liars) that the Bush administration lied about Iraq WMD. Where are you Scott Shane????
Link to the translated document on FR: 2001 Iraqi Document: Saddam Approved the Re-Use of Nuclear Equipment http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1725141/posts
Moreover, there are documents dated 1999-2001 that talk about Saddam regime projects to re-build some of the nuclear program facilities like RWTS (Radioactive Waste Treatment Station) and Radio-Chemistry laboratories which were part of Iraq previous clandestine nuclear program. Link to the translated document on FR: Iraqi Documents: Projects to Rebuild Saddam Nuclear Facilities http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1718125/posts .
Also this one
Iraqi Documents Show Plans for Prohibited Nuclear Projects http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1709390/posts
"Is there a keyword search for your translations?"
Here is his web site: http://iraqdocs.blogspot.com/
Thank you for the link.
That is exactly what I was looking for.
You're welcome! bttt
Outstanding!!
Maybe I should rephrase. What stuns me the most is the lack of reaction by John Q Public when it comes to the obvious posturing of the NYT and the old media. To me, this is frightening, that we have a 'Pravda-like' messenger and we can't do more about it. Sure, they're dying off but in the meantime, I believe they are doing irreparable harm to national security, not to mention public morale.
And my sincere thanks to your daughter for what she is doing. You must be so proud!
You can search for it as well under my FR home page http://www.freerepublic.com/~jveritas/
I will always be your humble freeper :)
Thanks, Brad, for the good summary of Judith Miller's situation. Miller was known at the Times to have good administration contacts, including in the VP's office. I think there was an expectation that when all was said and done her testimony would bring down Rove and Cheney, too. When this turned out not to be the case she was kicked out of the clique at the newsroom. She was on borrowd time anyway at that point.
That is excellent.
I just sent this to 2 of the local conservative talk radio show hosts on kvi.com. One is talking about the article now - hope he sees my mail. The other, Bryan Suits, was in Iraq last year and has had jveritas on his show before.
Thanks bro. I have written to Gonzales re: NYT. They need an order for all documents to stand and not be able to be destroyed at the paper. You and I know they're twisting this... they have other sources as well. We need to know how long they knew of any nuclear activity.
As evidenced by past columns there... they knew. They purposely information.
If you want to upgrade from pajamas to smoking jacket and ascot (as well as a stogie, fireplace and toddy), we have to correct them. Fmail me on what to get out.
BTW, if the NYTs is found guilty of sedition and treason for holding said info, we can set up a firing squad for them at the WTC site. Pinch and Salz first.
You have my vote for Freeper of the year!
Thanks SC, it looks like the word might finally start getting out. I can't begin to say how many emails I've sent to various people and never received a reply but it's been worth it if they start talking now.
Thank you! I've had your blog site bookmarked since you first posted it and just retrieved it from there.
Thank you again for everything you're doing to make sure that the real truth sees the light of day. You are "Da MAN"!!! :)
ping
Sadly, this just violates the Round Hole, Square Peg newsbyte size.
Some examples that seemed to fit ok:
Foley bad::>Republicans should lose congress
Kerry smarmy::>Kerry blooper--move along
Iraq was pursuing WMD---here's the proof::>Bush's fault for posting publicly!
Populace response::>Zzzzzzzzz......
I just don't know how to capitalize on this without putting the masses off. Apparently, neither does Karl Rove, so I don't feel too bad!
Thank You! Thank You! Thank You!
http://levin.nationalreview.com/
Here is Mark's take on this:
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.