To: hipaatwo
The New York Times is confirming that in 2002, Iraq was one year away from building an atomic bomb.
Umm, no. It's a poorly written paragraph of the article, but they're not saying Iraq was one year away from having an atomic bomb in 2002 - they mean 1991.
61 posted on
11/02/2006 8:27:34 PM PST by
Strategerist
(Those who know what's best for us must rise and save us from ourselves)
To: Strategerist
Umm, no. It's a poorly written paragraph of the article, but they're not saying Iraq was one year away from having an atomic bomb in 2002 - they mean 1991.Uh no they could not have meant that. Iraq did not have a workable design for a nuclear weapon in 1992.
78 posted on
11/02/2006 8:34:29 PM PST by
jwalsh07
(Jhengis Johnny was against an apology before he was for it, sort of.)
To: Strategerist
Umm, no. It's a poorly written paragraph of the article...Another botched joke incident? How likely is that?
96 posted on
11/02/2006 8:39:19 PM PST by
LikeLight
(RYMB)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson