Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: proud_yank

I have said all along, and still say, there is more about Saddam's WMD than we know at this point. We did NOT go into Iraq just because we could (and there is a reason the democrats voted to go to Iraq, they were scared). I am still convinced (and have read documentation right here on FR) Saddam was intent on making WMD and providing these to terrorists to eventually be used against us.

And I am still convinced the anthrax used during 9/11 was from Iraq. Does anyone remember the story about Mohammed Atta and his co-terrorist in Florida going to a pharmacist with rashes on their hands (the kind anthrax would make)? There is a reason that case has not been solved.

I am no political expert, but I believe this to be the case, and proof of Saddam's intent will be revealed right before the next presidential election, and after all the DIMS have had plenty of time to play the "Bush lied" game.



114 posted on 11/03/2006 6:50:40 AM PST by girlangler (Fish Fear Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: girlangler

I completely agree with you. Furthermore, for all their screaming (Bush lied, war for oil, etc) it was Clinton that authorized the war in 1998.

I'll have to see if I can find the speech he gave when he was launching missile raids in Iraq, you'd think he and Pres. Bush had the same speech writers.


124 posted on 11/03/2006 12:30:09 PM PST by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson