Posted on 11/02/2006 4:55:43 PM PST by letsgonova19087
NYT PLANS EXCLUSIVE STORY ON IRAQ AND RESEARCH OF NUKE BOMB... NEWSROOM SOURCE TELLS DRUDGE: 'IT WILL LEAD THE PAPER ON FRIDAY... IT SHOULD IGNITE NEWS CYCLES'... DEVELOPING...
Any focus on WOT still helps the GOP going into the final stretch.
Well, that would be bad that the posting on the web may have helped Iran, but doesn't that then confirm Iraq's research was less benign than the "Bush lied" crowd would have all of us believe?
The more I think about this, the better the news seems. If the documents found in iraq were so vital, it proves the point that Hussein needed to be taken out.
And it justifies the war at the same time.
the technology for detonation is in fact, pretty simple. the real issue is refining enough material to make the core.
"Federal government set up Web site -- Operation Iraqi Freedom Document Portal -- to make public a vast archive of Iraqi documents captured during the war".(snip)
"......it's like watching animals right before an earthquake."
Why do I suddenly feel like an animal in the middle of a fight or flight response then?
This is nothing but more enemy propaganda coming from the OLD GREY WHORE!!
I'd say it proves our point, but I hardly think the NYT will spin it that way.
Holy crap...you mean to say, the evidence of WMDs in Iraq have been sitting on a website all of this time, for anyone to see, and yet only now the NYTs thinks this is the right time to call attention to it?
OMG, I guess I'll say it, too: ROVE, you magnificent bastard...
Not on a weekend. This story will play on CNN and the weenies are going to wonder why if the MSM said Saddam had no weapons program, where did the information come from.
And even if all this is true, would you want a RAT in office at this time?
Any focus on WOT still helps the GOP going into the final stretch.
HBO had a doc on tonight about Voting Machine Fraud, that will be what is on the lefties mind tomorrow. They already have this planned in case they do not win on Tue, with lawyers standing by........
I don't see this chaning dim-wits minds. Maybe I will be wrong. But Joe & Suzy stupid do not care about truth, and NY Times knows that. This will come across as GOP dirty tricks in their lame brains.
--so let me see if I have this straight...
There were no WMDs in Iraq, and there is no evidence that Saddam was researching them or working to acquire them, but when evidence of said research is posted publically, it might help other badguys with research, even though there is no evidence of WMDs in Iraq, and the other guys were further along in their nuke program?
Only the New York Times could come up with that story.--
This could be a PRE-EMPTIVE strike attempt by NYT, to SPIN info favorable to the Administration (hence unfavorable to the libs) that was scheduled to come out a bit later.
ABC News (Brian Ross & Nightline) did something similar with the Saddam Tapes back in March (or April?) 2006. They tried to spin info. to make it sound like Saddam was no threat.
Nice of you to join FR today to post that bit of information.
What prompted you to wander over here from DailyKos?
Which could explain why this Move America Forward goup is planning any announcement on Saturday.
Maybe it's the recipe for yellow cake!
I'm not sure...but if the NYT is going to print what it is being rumored—I think they just did the President/GOP a HUGE favor.
Weird.
Duncan Hines has good yellow cake. If you add extra eggs and extra cooking oil it is really good. With choc icing!
We should announce a major airstrike on Sunday night killed a major figure and undisclosed reports say it is Osama.
When he comes out to deny it, people will see the devil and vote Republican. If he doesn't show, people will think we finally got him and vote Republican.
All the RATS can do is accuse the administration of what? Playing politics with Terrorism?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.