Skip to comments.
NYT Plans Exclusive Story on Iraq and Research of Nuke Bomb
the drudge report ^
| 11/2/06
| matt drudge
Posted on 11/02/2006 4:55:43 PM PST by letsgonova19087
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 401-412 next last
To: usmcobra
Well, is Drudge ever going to put the story out? In a few hours the Times will have it published.
101
posted on
11/02/2006 6:10:26 PM PST
by
A Citizen Reporter
(Sign at World Series in St. Louis, October 27, 2006 "The Experts are Idiots")
To: Fresh Wind
Just a wild theory.It would be nice, though..
102
posted on
11/02/2006 6:11:56 PM PST
by
cardinal4
(Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi..)
To: cardinal4
To: woofie
I think it will a hit piece against President Bush that will be full of lies and distortions.
104
posted on
11/02/2006 6:12:26 PM PST
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: Fresh Wind
Could explain why Bush & Rove have been so optimistic.
Wishful thinking I know...
To: elhombrelibre
Sadr is developing a nuke using plaque off of his teeth. BWAAHAHHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
106
posted on
11/02/2006 6:16:36 PM PST
by
Mr. Buzzcut
(metal god ... visit The Ponderosa .... www.vandelay.com ... DEATH BEFORE DHIMMITUDE)
To: Prost1
I will be a contrarian and suggest that just maybe, before the elections, the NYT is changing it's stripes and this will be a support piece for the Bush Admin I dunno ... This paper pimped for Stalin.
107
posted on
11/02/2006 6:17:42 PM PST
by
Mr. Buzzcut
(metal god ... visit The Ponderosa .... www.vandelay.com ... DEATH BEFORE DHIMMITUDE)
To: Mr. Buzzcut
If this was from the dem side, we would have heard it a few days earlier when they were freaking out about Kerry, perhaps? That it was completely quiet until now, maybe rove?
Yes, I know my thinking is more hoping, but who knows.
To: jveritas
NJewsopapers want to sell news no matter what it is ..if there is good news from the WH someone has to put it out there ....and I dont think they would lead with Fox...
Maybe Im an optimist but Rove is Rove
109
posted on
11/02/2006 6:19:11 PM PST
by
woofie
(If not this war then which one?)
To: letsgonova19087
i'm afraid they are latching on to conspiracy theory about the forward operating base falcon destruction earlier this month. a fire destroyed the ammunition dump at falcon during which, there was a huge explosion (that many daily-kossaks are convinced was a tactical nuke) producing a mushroom cloud.
my suspicion? that the nyt is going to run speculation-as-fact (again) and try and nail bush for having a nuke in iraq.
110
posted on
11/02/2006 6:19:12 PM PST
by
kahoona
(revenge is best served cold)
To: woofie
wow ...I can spell Newspapers
111
posted on
11/02/2006 6:20:25 PM PST
by
woofie
(If not this war then which one?)
To: kahoona
I don't think that is "nuke research"
Maybe this is why rove et al have been so weirdly optimistic.
To: letsgonova19087
How about "Bush caught giving nuclear bomb secrets to Iraqi terrorists in effort to legitimize lies he told while involving us in this illegal war"
Considering this is nyt thats got to be the ticket.
To: woofie
I hope you are right, but I do not recall when did the New York Times publish anything good about President Bush and the Republican Party. Anyway, if they are lying we have strong evidence to expose their lies.
114
posted on
11/02/2006 6:22:12 PM PST
by
jveritas
(Support The Commander in Chief in Times of War)
To: kahoona
i'm afraid they are latching on to conspiracy theory about the forward operating base falcon destruction earlier this month. a fire destroyed the ammunition dump at falcon during which, there was a huge explosion (that many daily-kossaks are convinced was a tactical nuke) producing a mushroom cloud. What a bunch of morons. Clearly they know nothing about nuclear weapons or explosives in general. A nuclear weapon will not produce nuclear yield because it is burned or blown up by an outside explosion. All that will do is set off the HE in the nuke incorrectly and throw plutonium all over the place.
Secondly, when enough conventional explosives go off, it will produce a mushroom cloud.
115
posted on
11/02/2006 6:22:19 PM PST
by
COEXERJ145
(Free Republic is Currently Suffering a Pandemic of “Bush Derangement Syndrome.”)
To: kahoona
"try and nail bush for having a nuke in iraq. "
What? First of all, there would be nuclear fallout all over Iraq, the Middle East and stretching into Asia. Second, why in the world would we need a nuke positioned in Iraq?
116
posted on
11/02/2006 6:22:45 PM PST
by
Rokke
To: woofie
Maybe Im an optimist but Rove is RoveAnd he has that machine fired up...
117
posted on
11/02/2006 6:23:00 PM PST
by
Fresh Wind
(Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
To: Tail Gunner John; dangerfield
Isn't there one soul on FR who has an in at the Times?
I mean how secret could this be,,somebody has to leak tonight.
To: Julliardsux
Does anyone know when the early edition comes out online?
119
posted on
11/02/2006 6:23:11 PM PST
by
cardinal4
(Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi..)
To: Julliardsux
Nah, better as late as possible, like the DUI thing in 2000.
Allows less time for a reasoned response.
120
posted on
11/02/2006 6:24:12 PM PST
by
Mr. Buzzcut
(metal god ... visit The Ponderosa .... www.vandelay.com ... DEATH BEFORE DHIMMITUDE)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 401-412 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson