Posted on 11/02/2006 11:20:17 AM PST by Miami Vice
Great post
Everybody LIKED Gene Debs, even the warden of the Atlanta Federal Pen (who was Gene's host during WWI.) He was a warm-hearted man who actually believed what he said, even though he was wrong.
Unlike that wannabe upper class twit Kerry.
What a coincidence that John Kerry should have similar views to a famous socialist when it comes to the military.
Was Debs really saying that? Was that his concept of the "working class"? And if Debs and Kerry were saying the same thing, is it really "the same thing" in the mouth of a labor leader and an Ivy League yuppie gigolo?
What Debs was saying would have resonated a lot with immigrant laborers who'd come here from Europe, where they probably didn't have any say in whether their countries went to war or not. The problem wasn't that the upper classes didn't want to fight and weren't willing to put their lives on the line -- some nobles could be quite bellicose -- but that humbler people didn't have a choice.
Debs's view doesn't fit the American experience so well, but it still resonates with a lot of people whose parents or grandparents may have come here to escape conscription in Europe's wars.
Of course the libs think this way. The only military men they know are Kerry, Cleland & Clark.....losers all.
The same claim was made during the Civil War, that the Union Army was full of German and Irish immigrants, and the Confederate Army was full of poor whites (who owned fewer than 20 slaves). "Rich man's war, poor man's fight."
"What if they gave a war and nobody came?"
John Kerry may not want to articulate this traditional Leftist view of international conflict, but he is clearly the heir to the tradition. There is real continuity between the thinking of Debs and the utterance of Kerry. The real difference is that Debs respected the workers (he was one) and Kerry clearly does not.
The Left has not changed. Same as it ever way (only more hypocritical).
I loved the book. It was the first real science fiction novel I ever read, and it made me a life-long fan.
What a travesty the movie was, playing into the fascist stereotypes of the brain-dead leftists.
Kerry suffers greatly by comparison to Eugene Debs, who for all his short-bus lefty delusions was rarely known to flip-flop.
Kerry's got the short-bus delusions down pat, but in terms of personal character Kerry falls short.
On the other hand, Debs was never in 'Nam.
Debs in that pic looks a lot like his hero, Lenin.
Yeah, that attitude allowed the Russian Revolution to succeed.
I'm sorry, I mean bolshevik revolution.
Though I am no fan of Eugene V. Debs, I wish to point out that Debs at least claimed to represent the people who made up the military and acknowledged their sacrifices. Today's elite Left dismisses them and their sacrifices entirely.
Awesome. Permanent link material right here.
Down 31) Socialist candidate Eugene
That was the clue in my local paper's crossword puzzle, today.
Tremoglie is a great writer. You should buy his novel A Sense of Duty.
It is the antidote to the liberalism that exists in novels and movies and songs and TV shows.
It is shame there is no such thing as an award for conservative fiction or politically incorrect novels it would win.
Great piece about Kerry in the Philadelphia Evening Bulletin
Debs at least was sincerely motivated (like so many deluded Americans who thought socialism was the cure for the excesses of the Gilded Age) to do what he thought was best for the ordinary American. He was essentially a kind person trying to do right, though he went horribly wrong.
Kerry just despises "ordinary Americans" and thinks he is SO much better than everybody else. He's not interested in helping anybody but himself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.