New Rick Santorum Ad - MUST SEE!!!!!!

Rick Santorum for Senate ^ | November 2, 2006 | Rick Santorum for Senate

[Dems_R_Losers]

Holy cow, you MUST WATCH THIS!!!!! Click here.

This one is gonna leave a mark...may be the single best ad of the year. God bless Rick Santorum.

[HitmanLV]

Even if true, does that necessarily mean my analysis is wrong?

What is your analysis of the Santorum-Casey race?

[mad_as_he$$]

Which one was that? I have been keeping an eye on that race because I like the guy. He may be one of the last honest politicians around. RCP has him at -12 today with none better than 10% and the worst at 17%.

[Dane]

Even if true(HLV's worshipping of the jerry brown supporting michael weiner), does that necessarily mean my analysis is wrong?

Your monica like support for the jerry brown supporting michael weiner(savage) makes your "analysis" suspect(especially with you relying on media polls).

[mad_as_he$$]

Yes but the Kerry story looks dead for tomorrow. We need another Dem gaff going into the weekend.

[Dane]

Which one was that? I have been keeping an eye on that race because I like the guy. He may be one of the last honest politicians around. RCP has him at -12 today with none better than 10% and the worst at 17%

Uh you do know that RCP has been taken over by Time magazine don't you.

I can't wait for the morning of November 8th when the biggest losers of this election is going to be the liberal media.

[Jorge]

JMO, Santorum wins, and his many enemies on the left and his enemies on the "right" will be cryinbg in their Starbucks on Novemebr 8th.

I don't think so. Guess you think every single poll is wrong as well as GOP predictions.

In any case for your information, I am not an "enemy on the right". I have voted for Santorum in EVERY election in PA.

[jwalsh07]

If Santorum can prove that, it will hurt Bob Casey and it willhurt Ed Rendell. If he can't prove that, then Rick Santorum has had it in politics. JMHO.

[buck61]

Short and, to the point.

[Dane]

I don't think so. Guess you think every single poll is wrong as well as GOP predictions.

JMO, I will trust Karl Rove's predictions rather than TimmY Russert's.

Also, no one is stopping you from believing Timmy Russert, but since you beleive Timmy Russert so much, you are a good candidate for a sales pitch and actually buying a bridge to Brooklyn, IMO.

[mad_as_he$$]

Yes I do and that stinks but they still seem to do a fair job of averaging the polls and sorting out the spread. The very fact that there is a 7% spread tells me that some polls are not getting solid answers. And yes I understand statistics (for the statistics police). But in a large enough population of ACCURATE sampling there shouldn't be much variation outside of about 3 sigma (in humans)with the same level of concern or involvement about the subject. Now if they could all be 6 sigma Conservatives!!!!

[HitmanLV]

Specifically why?

[BurbankKarl]

Are we talking about Man on Dog Sex here?

[jwalsh07]

Anyone with eyes and clarity can recognize this is a desperate ad.

ANybody with a brain should know that if the allegation is true it is not only a legitimate campaign issue it is a legitimate policy issue that needs airing.

[HitmanLV]

Dead would be an overstatement, but I wish it had more punch for the weekend.

[Jorge]

Also, no one is stopping you from believing Timmy Russert, but since you beleive Timmy Russert so much, you are a good candidate for a sales pitch and actually buying a bridge to Brooklyn, IMO.

Geez, you're wrong yet again.

I never listen to Tim Russert.
Two strikes now. One more and you're OUT!

[EmilyGeiger]

Super ad! Hope it helps him.

[Dane]

Please don't play dumb. You(weiner/savage supporter) have been outed.

I can't wait till the morning of November 8th, when you all(weiner supporters) are crying in your Starbucks over Santorums's victory.

[HitmanLV]

ANybody with a brain should know that if the allegation is true it is not only a legitimate campaign issue it is a legitimate policy issue that needs airin

And anybody with a brain and clarity can see that the ad doesn't make the accusation look particularly convincing. My point is that the ad fails to communicate this issue convincingly, and that it's nature make Santorum look bad. To the extent that it's an important issue, that makes the ads failure to appear credible even worse.

[Dane]

I never listen to Tim Russert

Then why are you parrotting his talking points.

BTW, you have already struck out by being Timmy Russert's, Edgar Bergen, on this thread.

[Dane]

And anybody with a brain and clarity can see that the ad doesn't make the accusation look particularly convincing.

LOL! Uber weinwer(savage) supporter showing his "john kerryness".

Keep on posting HLV, you give john kerry a run for his money in the hubris dept.