To: jwalsh07
ANybody with a brain should know that if the allegation is true it is not only a legitimate campaign issue it is a legitimate policy issue that needs airin And anybody with a brain and clarity can see that the ad doesn't make the accusation look particularly convincing. My point is that the ad fails to communicate this issue convincingly, and that it's nature make Santorum look bad. To the extent that it's an important issue, that makes the ads failure to appear credible even worse.
238 posted on
11/02/2006 6:04:21 PM PST by
HitmanLV
("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
To: HitmanLV
And anybody with a brain and clarity can see that the ad doesn't make the accusation look particularly convincing. LOL! Uber weinwer(savage) supporter showing his "john kerryness".
Keep on posting HLV, you give john kerry a run for his money in the hubris dept.
240 posted on
11/02/2006 6:06:56 PM PST by
Dane
("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
To: HitmanLV
Nonsense. The ad is opening a debate that should be aired. In that respect, Santorum has done America a service as long as the predicate is true. If it is not true then he has done a disservice to himself, his opponent and his state.
245 posted on
11/02/2006 6:10:23 PM PST by
jwalsh07
(Jhengis Johnny was against an apology before he was for it, sort of.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson