Replies

If there was nothing to this, it could be disposed of in two hours of work. Ann's lawyer is demanding special treatment that no one else in this situation would receive. He's let this thing gather trouble for nine months. Now, either (a) he's not serving his client's best interests, and his client is dumber than a box of rocks, or (b) he is serving his client's best interests. The only way (b) is true is if Ann's in a heap o' trouble.

It's rather preposterous to think that Ann Coulter would purposely do something illegal, and expect to stay under the radar. She is after all a very public person, and, due to her politics and very confident manner, a target.

In July, Anderson said, he received a letter from Coulter's attorney, Marcos Daniel Jimenez D'Clouet. The letter said the attorney would only discuss the matter in person or by telephone because, he complained, Anderson had given details to the media. Anderson said the matter had to be discussed in writing.

I think this a fair request. Does anyone seriously think if this was about Ann Jones that the case would be pursued with such vigor?? Lawyers negotiate. That's their job. Her lawyer is doing his job in trying to protect her.

I wonder how many dead people and felons will vote in FLA. Will Anderson pursue THAT "scandal"? I doubt it...

If there was nothing to this, it could be disposed of in two hours of work.

Says you - a person that knows little about the case. Your opinion of the lawyers actions is of no value. You assume a heck of a lot. You might want to wait for the charges before you draw conclusions - all you have now is a few sentences from a hostile media and a partisan Democrat DA saying he might bring charges after spending nine months "looking into this case" and just happened to release his non-statement statement less than a week before an election.