Says you - a person that knows little about the case. Your opinion of the lawyers actions is of no value. You assume a heck of a lot. You might want to wait for the charges before you draw conclusions - all you have now is a few sentences from a hostile media and a partisan Democrat DA saying he might bring charges after spending nine months "looking into this case" and just happened to release his non-statement statement less than a week before an election.
Been there, done that. Did not vote from the address I was officially domiciled in, and the fact that I was working a political campaign at the time got noticed. Got a fine for my trouble. then again, I didn't drag it out for nine months.
Your opinion of the lawyers actions is of no value.
Well, then, neither is your opinion on this issue.
You assume a heck of a lot.
Yes, I do. I base it on a lot of life experience. When people make demands that they know are going to be rejected on the spot, it's because they know what the final disposition of the case will be once the facts are in.
If Ann didn't do anything, she needs to get that information to the elections supervisor immediately. If she screwed up and voted in the wrong precinct because of simple error, she needs to 'fess up and sin no more. If she gave a straw address, she needs to have her attorney plead it down to a misdemeanor. But, first of all, she needs to ditch the "I'm a star" mentality that demands special treatment from the civil authorities because she's famous. She's stuck with the fact that her residence information is public information in Florida (you can get it in a matter of seconds via the Internet, and that has nothing to do with voter rolls). Whining about it will not help. She needs to just get this done with. Yes, some things in life really are that simple.