Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Last Visible Dog

The fact that her lawyer has refused to do ANYTHING with this unless his non-negotiable demands are met (which they never will be) points away from "innocent" and towards "guilty," unless it's pointing to "too stupid to realize that her lawyer is billing nine months' worth of time for a two-hour job."


132 posted on 11/02/2006 9:59:38 PM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse ( ~()):~)>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
The fact that her lawyer has refused to do ANYTHING with this unless his non-negotiable demands are met (which they never will be) points away from "innocent" and towards "guilty,"

So you just assume guilt - like I said, it is scary you were a cop if this is your understanding of our judicial system. Your option of the lawyers actions (of which you know very little) is not a basis for guilt or innocence.

unless it's pointing to "too stupid to realize that her lawyer is billing nine months' worth of time for a two-hour job."

First you say her lawyer is doing nothing and then you claim he is billing for nine months - you are just making it up as you go along. Ann Coulter is a Constitutional Lawyer and most likely understands a bit more about the law than an ex-cop. Clearly you dislike Ann but making sh*t up is rather silly.

134 posted on 11/02/2006 10:14:21 PM PST by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson