Thanks to Fair Opinion for starting this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1732302/posts
97 Reasons Democrats Are Weak On Defense And Can't Be Trusted To Govern In Wartime
Investors Business Daily ^ | Nov. 4, 2006 | IBD
Posted on 11/04/2006 11:48:08 AM PST by FairOpinion
Today's Democrats are nothing like Presidents Roosevelt, Truman and Kennedy, who with courage and decisive action kept on top of their jobs and aggressively confronted one national defense crisis after another.
We're in a war. Something always goes wrong in a war, and our military leaders have made mistakes in Iraq. But quitting and leaving would amount to defeat for the U.S. in the global war on terrorism and create chaos. Quitters never win.
However, (97) when it comes to which party has proved more capable in acting to defend and protect Americans from foreign enemies, there is only one choice. From Johnson to Carter to Clinton, virtually all the defense policies and decisions made by Democratic administrations have been unsuccessful. And in many cases, they have unintentionally but materially increased the danger to our national security and the safety of all Americans.
(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...
Note: The post in 178 is a quote.
Thanks to Fair Opinion for the ping to this thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1732341/posts
"Dick Morris and David Bossie Unveil New “Wiretap” Ad: Dem Weakness in Fighting Terrorism"
CItizens United ^ | Oct. 30, 2006 | Stephen Manfredi
Posted on 11/04/2006 1:08:01 PM PST by FairOpinion