To: patton
This ia an absolutely false assertion. It is an amazing logical leap... the government can continue to ignore the eyewitnss reports... or they can claim it was a "bolide".
44 posted on
11/01/2006 9:39:57 PM PST by
Swordmaker
(Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
To: Swordmaker
Or, it can be that the hydrocode was wrong, and bad input data may be irrelevant.
45 posted on
11/01/2006 9:42:02 PM PST by
patton
(Sanctimony frequently reaps its own reward.)
To: Swordmaker
It is an amazing logical leap... the government can continue to ignore the eyewitnss reports... or they can claim it was a "bolide". Ask any police investigator and they will tell you that the least reliable evidence in any criminial investigation will be eyewitness testimony.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson