No they don't look here 
After looking at all the available evidence in the months after it happened, it became evident to me that TWA 800 was almost certainly brought down by a missile.
There were two possible theories: that the missile was fired by American forces taking part in a naval exercise in the area; or that the missile was fired by Muslim terrorists in a small boat.
I think the naval hypothesis is almost impossible. Too many people would have known what happened, and leaks would have been inevitable. There have been no such leaks from the Navy.
Why would clinton have covered it up? Because he wanted to protect the Navy, or because he wanted to avoid having to do something about Arab terrorists? Frankly, I think he would have been far more worried about having to deal with the terrorists than he would have been concerned about the Navy's reputation. He and hillary (and Chelsea too) hated the military.
On the other hand, he had a long record of avoiding any need to deal with terrorism by looking the other way.
Ray Lahr deserves our thanks for following this up. The current administration has shown no interest in uncovering clinton's crimes. Indeed, Bush's chosen director of the FBI, Mueller, awarded a special medal and promotion to the FBI agent who was in charge of covering up TWA 800 for clinton.
I agree re: missile. The fact is that center fuel tanks simply don't do what they said. Jet fuel is about as flammable as charcoal lighter stuff, it works well under pressure and controlled conditions in the engine, but propane or gasoline it ain't.
And the laws of large numbers argues against it. There have been tens of millions of aircraft flights, and this center tank thingy happens JUST ONCE???
Not to mention that Boeing is the greatest aircraft manufacturer ever and despite what some may say, pays alot of attention to quality and safety. They probably have thousands of terrabytes of flight data recording info.
No they don't look here
There is ONE HUGE hole in the muslim terrorist theory. The purpose of terrorism is to CREATE TERROR. If a terrorist actually did this, there would be a claim so that the event would cause terror!
There is ONE HUGE hole in the muslim terrorist theory. The purpose of terrorism is to CREATE TERROR. If a terrorist actually did this, there would be a claim so that the event would cause terror!
I do not agree.
The U.S. Navy denied, for months, it even had ships in the area that night. Then, the Navy finally admitted that there were a number of ships in the area which steamed away from the area just after the downing of TWA 800.
I have two questions:
1. Why would the Navy deny it had ships present?
2. Why would ships of the U.S. Navy depart the scene of an incredible air disaster when it could have at least assisted with the aftermath?
The ships were, of course, ordered to depart the scene to hide their role in the airliner's crash.
I subscribe to the theory there was a secret missile test to see if a missile intercept could distinguish between friend or foe in the busy airspace. It failed and a horrible tragedy resulted. The White House ordered the cover-up of that August fiasco as Clinton was running for reelection in November and would surely have been blamed for the reckless murder of innocents aboard TWA 800 at his authorizing the secret test.
I have done a lot of research on TWA 800.
The FBI completely commandeered the investigation of the crash in violation of federal law which requires the NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board) to conduct such investigations.
The laughable animation purporting to show the noseless aircraft climbing is a violation of all laws of physics and no serious scientist could agree with the conclusions of the presentation.
The computer animation was created by the CIA, of all the craziest agencies to get involved! It was not NASA or another real scientific agency that created the preposterous animation being foisted upon the public.
Why would the CIA be enlisted to make a scientific case if there was true science, and not propaganda, behind the explanation?