Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Losing A Key Constituency
Transterrestrial Musings ^ | October 31, 2006 | Rand Simberg

Posted on 10/31/2006 4:28:04 PM PST by NonZeroSum

I don't usually do deep political analysis, particularly when it comes to getting down and dirty with demographics, but I'm fascinated by this story, and it seems particularly appropriate on Halloween:

An analysis of state-wide records by the Poughkeepsie Journal reveals that 77,000 dead people remain on election rolls in New York State, and some 2,600 may have managed to vote after they had died. The study also found that Democrats are more successful at voting after death than Republicans, by a margin of four-to-one, largely because so many dead people seem to vote in Democrat-dominated New York City.

In light of today's holiday, on which, like Kwanzaa for blacks and Cinco de Mayo for Mexicans, this demographic is particularly celebrated, I'm going to ask the question that nobody seems to ever ask, and one that the Republicans have to be asking themselves: how have they lost that key demographic, the metabolically challenged?

Admittedly, the Dems don't have the dead vote locked up in the same way that they do the black vote (only four to one, rather than the ten to one they traditionally get from the African American community), but that's still a huge "fog a mirror" gap. And the implications have to be frightening for the Republicans. After all, this is the largest demographic group of all--there are many times as many dead people as there are living ones, and that's likely to remain the case for some time to come, and probably forever, unless we develop radical life extension technologies.

So far, the GOP has been fortunate, because, whether due to apathy, or barriers thrown up at the polls, the dead don't tend to vote at all, by and large. But perhaps, if they could not only get many of them to switch party affiliation, but also mount a huge GOTDV drive, they could actually take advantage of this huge potential voting block, and take away a traditional Democrat advantage.

So what is it about the Dems that appeals to the non-living voters?

It really is a mystery, at least at first glance. You'd think that dead people would be naturally conservative. What more static, unchangeable state can there be, after all, but the grave? And after all, it isn't the Republicans who want to tax the dead. You'd think that these people would be voting their pocketbooks, even if the leather in them is rotting away. And yet they still continue to pull the donkey lever.

It can't be the entitlements: they're all at a stage of their life at which they don't really need the Social Security and Medicare any more.

Is it abortion on demand? That wouldn't seem to be a life-or-death issue (so to speak) for people well beyond their prime child-bearing years. And state of health.

Is it the war? The dead have little to fear from war. Their stuff's not going to get broken, because their descendants have it now, and what they didn't pass on, the Democrats taxed away. As for the last measure of devotion, how much worse can it get than being dead? That can't be it.

How about gun control? Well some, perhaps even many, of the dead may be dead as a result of guns. But given all of the other frailties and diseases that come with being human, it seems unlikely that this is a significant number of them. I can't imagine that this is what appeals to them about the gun-control party.

Support for the UN, and immigration? Well, here's a good possibility. After all, most of the dead aren't American citizens. Of course, the ones that aren't, aren't eligible to vote, either. But then, neither are dead people, so this hardly seems to be a major barrier.

You know, I think we may have it.

The key for Republicans is to really tighten up on the voting rolls, and only allow American dead to vote, and actually require, you know, IDs and stuff. Of course, we can expect the Dems to scream in outrage, about "voter intimidation," etc., to such a policy.

You know, on second thought, maybe we should just put up a fence around graveyards.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: braindead; deadvoting; dems
Finally, an explanation...
1 posted on 10/31/2006 4:28:05 PM PST by NonZeroSum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum

Of COURSE the Dead vote for Democrats. It's the ultimate victim group. I'm just surprised Chris Matthews doesn't book more of them on his show, just so he can launch in to Ann Coulter when she disagrees with them.


2 posted on 10/31/2006 4:30:10 PM PST by Question Liberal Authority (Kerry's Joke Insulted The Wrong People In The Wrong War At the Wrong Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority
Of COURSE the Dead vote for Democrats.

Don't say "dead," you filthy bigot! Say "Zombie American!"

3 posted on 10/31/2006 4:39:27 PM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("It'sTime for Republicans to Start Toeing the Conservative Line, NOT the Other Way Around!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NonZeroSum
"The study also found that Democrats are more successful at voting after death than Republicans, by a margin of four-to-one"

Furthermore, as one astute FReeper pointed out, who is to say that the 1 in 5 dead voters registered Republican is not actually voting for Democrat candidates on the ballot.

4 posted on 10/31/2006 4:42:12 PM PST by Unmarked Package
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Question Liberal Authority
just so he [Chrissy] can launch in to Ann Coulter when she disagrees with them [the dead voters]

lol!

5 posted on 10/31/2006 4:48:43 PM PST by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Unmarked Package

Ronald Reagan still votes Republican.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1729606/posts?page=9


6 posted on 10/31/2006 7:28:08 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson