[bnelson44]

I think Kerry misspoke. I think Kerry intended to say that if aren't educated you could get the country into Iraq (or something to that effect). It was suppose to be a slam on Bush. But he misspoke and it went downhill from there. I think for Kerry it was easy for him to make the error, because I think in his heart of hearts he really believes that those in the military are dumb, but I don't think he intended to say it.

[Steven W.]

I think Kerry misspoke. I think Kerry intended to say that if aren't educated you could get the country into Iraq (or something to that effect). It was suppose to be a slam on Bush.

uhh no. Kerry intended to say what he said and said what he intended. He and other DemoncRATs have said the same & - actually - much worse before.

[highimpact]

I think for Kerry it was easy for him to make the error, because I think in his heart of hearts he really believes that those in the military are dumb, but I don't think he intended to say it.

Did he mean to say that our brave fighters in Iraq are in fact terrorizing women and children? Did he mean it when he talked about servicemen hooking up electrodes to the genitals of Vietcong prisoners, chopping off their ears, raping and pillaging, reminiscent of JENJIS KAHN, etc.? What pattern of behavior leads you to believe that he DIDN'T intend to insult and demean those who volunteer to serve? He obviously holds the military in very low regard. I think it's very clear what he meant. No amount of "spin" from the Kerry camp will sweep this under the rug.

[SusaninOhio]

IF he was not referring to the military, why did he feel he had to come up with not one, but TWO totally different explanations for what he said?

Firstly, he was 'talking about the President and the failed plans etcetcetcetc'.

THEN it was a 'humorous commment that didn't quite come off right' or words to that effect.

IF and I repeat IF because I do not believe EITHER of his lies, he did not mean to insult every member of our excellent military, why has he had to express two completely different explanations for his vile remarks?

Hmmmm? He has a short memory and he couldn't remember what he meant? He has a hard time with the truth? Which lie is the right lie?

I wait for your peerless explanation.

Kerry is a vile, nasty excuse for a human being. He said exactly what he meant. After all, he is JOHN KERRY, and don't anyone forget it.

[UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide]

It was suppose to be a slam on Bush. But he misspoke and it went downhill from there.

Doesn't work logically, since it is well known that Kerry's college GPA was lower than Bush's, unless he is slamming himself for his war vote as well.

[Godebert]

"I think Kerry misspoke. I think Kerry intended to say that if aren't educated you could get the country into Iraq (or something to that effect). It was suppose to be a slam on Bush. But he misspoke and it went downhill from there. I think for Kerry it was easy for him to make the error, because I think in his heart of hearts he really believes that those in the military are dumb, but I don't think he intended to say it."

No doubt he now wishes he hadn't said it. I think he meant what he said.

I also think you are a limp-wristed liberal troll.