Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Breakthrough as NKorea agrees to resume nuclear talks
AP via Yahoo! ^ | October 31, 2006 | Peter Harmsen

Posted on 10/31/2006 11:24:10 AM PST by Brilliant

North Korea has agreed to return to talks on its nuclear programme, the United States said, in a diplomatic breakthrough just three weeks after stunning the world with its first atomic test.

US President George W. Bush said he was "very pleased" at the surprise announcement, which followed seven hours of secret negotiations in Beijing.

The talks -- involving China, the two Koreas, Russia, the United States and Japan -- could restart as soon as November, Washington's chief negotiator Christopher Hill told reporters here.

North Korea reaffirmed its pledge to give up nuclear weapons in exchange for security guarantees and other concessions, and set no conditions for ending its year-long boycott of the talks, he said.

The development was immediately welcomed by South Korea, Japan, Russia and Britain, as well as the White House, and Bush said US teams would be sent to monitor the situation.

"We'll be sending teams to the region to work with our partners to make sure that the current United Nations Security Council resolution is enforced but also to make sure the talks are effective, that we achieve the result we want," he said, referring to Washington's desire for North Korea to abandon all of its nuclear weapons programs.

Hill's announcement at a hastily-arranged news conference followed seven hours of secret talks between the US negotiator and his counterparts to the six-party talks from North Korea and its closest ally China.

"We believe it will be either this coming month, November, (or) possibly December," he replied when asked when the talks would restart.

"They did not make any conditions," he added. "For us it was very important that no-one should create conditions for attending the talks."

Hill said North Korea, one of the most poorest and isolated regimes in the world, had reaffirmed the pledge it first made last year -- before the talks stalled -- to give up nuclear weapons in return for concessions.

"We all reaffirmed, including the North Koreans, our commitment to the September (2005) statement and the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula," he said.

South Korea said the developments had eased tensions following the North's October 9 atomic test.

"It gives us relief," South Korea's unification ministry spokesman Yang Chang-seok told Yonhap news agency.

US National Security Council spokesman Gordon Johndroe said in Washington: "We welcome the announcement and look forward to resuming the talks soon."

Japan's top government spokesman, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuhisa Shiozaki, said Tokyo had been seeking the North's "prompt, unconditional return" to the multilateral process.

The Russian foreign ministry welcomed the development and Britain hailed it as "very positive".

North Korea pulled out of the talks in November last year in protest at US financial sanctions imposed against it for alleged counterfeiting and money laundering by Pyongyang.

Pyongyang had insisted it would not return until those financial sanctions were lifted.

However Hill said North Korean envoy Kim Kye-Gwan had told him Tuesday that it was now ready to deal with that issue in the six-party forum.

"They made very clear that these were not conditions, but they wanted to hear that we would address the issue of the financial measures in the context of the talks," Hill said.

"And I said we would be prepared to create a mechanism, or working group and to address these financial issues."

He gave no indication as to why North Korea had made such a dramatic U-turn.

The Chinese foreign ministry said Beijing had initiated the secret talks here, which also included China's envoy Wu Dawei.

"The three parties engaged in a frank and deep exchange of views on continuing the six-party talks. The three parties agreed to carry out the six-party talks in the near future, at the six parties' convenience," it said in a statement on its website.

North Korea's nuclear test triggered fierce global condemnation, including from China, and led to sweeping UN sanctions.

The six-party talks began in 2003 with the intent of convincing North Korea to give up its nuclear ambitions.

On September 19 last year, the North agreed to give up its nuclear weapons in exchange for pledges of aid and security.

In that agreement, North Korea said it would renounce all nuclear weapons and programmes, return to the international Non-Proliferation Treaty and allow UN weapons inspectors back into the country.

The other countries agreed to "respect" the North's demand for peaceful nuclear energy and said Pyongyang's request to have a light-water reactor for peaceful purposes would be revisited "at an appropriate time".

Peter Beck, Northeast Asia director of the International Crisis Group, said the breakthrough was largely down to China.

"The fact they agreed to negotiations so quickly is a clear indication that China's arm-twisting has worked," he told AFP.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: china; japan; jungil; northkorea; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
Looks like Bush is a genius (by Democrat standards). He's gotten North Korea to talk. Everything will be fine now.
1 posted on 10/31/2006 11:24:11 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

RoVE, YOU MAGNIFICENT BASTARD!.......


2 posted on 10/31/2006 11:25:47 AM PST by Red Badger (ECCLESIASTES 10 The heart of the wise inclines to the RIGHT, but the heart of the fool to the LEFT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant


Then it's agreed, we will have ranch dressing on our salads. Oh, light dressing?

Oh crap, he hung up again...

-Liberal US diplomats making "breakthroughs" with North Korea


3 posted on 10/31/2006 11:26:42 AM PST by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Hillary for President! www.dndorks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Hope someone informs Senator Lugar.
4 posted on 10/31/2006 11:27:22 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Typical AP grammar:

one of the most poorest and isolated regimes in the world.

5 posted on 10/31/2006 11:28:14 AM PST by capt. norm (Liberalism = cowardice disguised as tolerance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Hey, maybe this will help the repubs in the election.
Woo hoo! Sorta like Nixon and China.


6 posted on 10/31/2006 11:29:49 AM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
The cynic in me thinks that Mr. Kim just need some more time to iron out problems his first nuclear test revealed but my non-cynical self thinks Mr. Kim just need some more time to iron out problems his first nuclear test revealed.
7 posted on 10/31/2006 11:31:35 AM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Methinks that the third wheel of the Axis of Evil is about come off.


8 posted on 10/31/2006 11:32:02 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

This isn't a breakthrough...it's a stalling tactic.


9 posted on 10/31/2006 11:32:20 AM PST by AlaskaErik (Everyone should have a subject they are ignorant about. I choose professional corporate sports.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Please, please don't let Bush be a sucker and believe anything they say. Don't give an inch in exchange for promises, hard evidence only.


10 posted on 10/31/2006 11:33:11 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik

What's he stalling? We aren't going to do anything anyway, and he knows it.

What's happened is that the Chinese finally realize that this is not helping them.


11 posted on 10/31/2006 11:33:56 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: antiRepublicrat

Bush is probably going to let the Chinese and the Japanese do the talking.


12 posted on 10/31/2006 11:34:48 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

"Me love you long time!" -Dear Leader

Yeah, right.


13 posted on 10/31/2006 11:36:52 AM PST by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Was it the UN, or was it the Japanese Navy? Maybe it was Secy Rice saying that the full range of US nukes work just fine. Maybe it was a phone call from Beijing at three in the morning.


14 posted on 10/31/2006 11:37:07 AM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

This could be significant, if only because it leaves liberals with egg on their face. The left had been insisting that NK's nuclear test was all Bush's fault because he wouldn't engage NK one-on-one. Now it looks like our approach has worked.


15 posted on 10/31/2006 11:45:36 AM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

I can't see how people think this is a breakthrough... NK has agreed to talk and pulled out the rug 10 times before. Why wouldn't they do it again? Saying this is a breakthrough is akin to telling someone dying of aids that the lesions are a pretty color.


16 posted on 10/31/2006 12:27:23 PM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

I don't think that anything Kim agrees to is a breakthru. But this time he's not doing it voluntarily. The Chinese are poking him with a spear. It's just a question of how far they are willing to go. They could crush him like a bug tomorrow.


And it would never have happened at all if Bush had agreed to one on one talks, as demanded by the Dems and the McCain wing.


17 posted on 10/31/2006 12:31:59 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik
This isn't a breakthrough...it's a stalling tactic.

Either that or another attempt to extort more money and nuke parts out of the West.

18 posted on 10/31/2006 12:34:20 PM PST by Cementjungle (Loads of folks will be shocked when they find that GWB isn't running this year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AlaskaErik
"This isn't a breakthrough...it's a stalling tactic."

I couldn't agree more. The nuclear test by North Korea was a set up for the West to offer more aid (spelled money) to Kim Jong Ill. If we do agree to pay this aid it will just lead to more extortion IMHO.
19 posted on 10/31/2006 12:50:02 PM PST by White Bear (There are no rules in a knife fight!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

I wonder if the current sKerry non-apology will take up too much time in the media, giving them a way to ignore this significant victory of Bush's foreign policy, to the dismay of the Klintoon fans saying we need to talk to them one-on-one like sending Maddy Albright to toast with "Dear Leader".


20 posted on 10/31/2006 2:53:40 PM PST by billiamy (my blogs: http://amperspective.blogspot.com/ and http://billclintonslies.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson