Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-war Democrat fighting a losing battle
The Daily Telegraph ^ | October 31, 2006 | Toby Harnden

Posted on 10/30/2006 10:52:35 PM PST by MadIvan

Liberal members of the Democratic Party hailed him as the bright new hope for the American Left after internet activists created the momentum that helped him to slay Senator Joe Lieberman, one of his party's big beasts.

But Ned Lamont has failed to make the transition from plucky underdog to official Democratic nominee. Despite pouring millions from his personal fortune into his campaign to become Connecticut's next senator, he is trailing Mr Lieberman by up to 17 points in opinion polls.

Standing in a half-empty village library, Mr Lamont, a fibre optics entrepreneur, is far from the assured candidate of the summer. Now, even voters in liberal New England are beginning to question whether his strident demands for troops to be brought home from Iraq will make America or the Middle East safer.

"This is a war of ideas," he told supporters in a library in Hamden. "If we stay true to who we are, we win that war."

He acknowledged that "we probably need some troops in order to complete the mission in Afghanistan" but advocated "tough love" in Iraq by leaving the Baghdad government to "take control of their own destiny". In an indication of increasing desperation, he made the unusual claim that Iraq war veterans were being treated worse than those who returned from Vietnam. "We have not shown that same level of respect for the troops coming home now from the troops that came home from Vietnam, frankly."

He cited Gen Sir Richard Dannatt, the Chief of the General Staff, to buttress his case. "The top general from Britain said just last week we're exacerbating the insurgency, British troops are coming home within a year and that's going to put pressure on the Maliki government to make the political compromises that are our best hope for Iraq." In fact, Sir Richard made no commitment to pull troops out within a timeframe.

With his sloping shoulders, a tie that droops down to his navel and a speaking style that comes close to a whine, Mr Lamont is not a politician who inspires confidence. The primary was confined to Democrat voters, but in next week's mid-term elections independents and Republicans, who overwhelmingly back Mr Lieberman, will also go to the polls.

In contrast, the pro-war Mr Lieberman, the Democrats' vice-presidential candidate in 2000, is enjoying a new lease of political life. Having been written off by his foes on the Left when he was defeated by Mr Lamont in August's primary, he now finds himself the potential kingmaker in the Senate. In a case of supreme political irony, it could be his vote that gives the Democrats a majority.

Now an independent, he has promised to caucus with the Democrats but has not ruled out crossing the floor to the Republican side if he is penalised for failing to concede to Mr Lamont. Now that the polls show that he should win, he is every Democratic senator's friend once again.

"I'm a devoted Democrat but independent-minded and I've always worked across party lines to get things done," Mr Lieberman told The Daily Telegraph. "I don't feel I have any obligation to follow party orthodoxy." He remains a strong supporter of the Iraq war, the issue that was his downfall in the primary, but has broadened the debate to what he has achieved for his home state in 18 years in Washington. "During the primary, I let Lamont define me rather than defining myself."

When asked what a defeat for him would mean for the Democrats, Mr Lamont sounded like he was resigned to losing.

"It'll be taken as a strong affirmation of George Bush's policies that, even in Connecticut, Joe Lieberman and George Bush won a majority of the vote."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: connecticut; fiberoptics; lamont; lieberman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
Although Lieberman is not conservative by any means, Lamont's repudiation is something to be happy about.

Regards, Ivan

1 posted on 10/30/2006 10:52:38 PM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mrs Ivan; odds; DCPatriot; Deetes; Barset; fanfan; LadyofShalott; Tolik; mtngrl@vrwc; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 10/30/2006 10:52:58 PM PST by MadIvan (I aim to misbehave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Ned just needs to spend more money, that's all!


3 posted on 10/30/2006 10:54:13 PM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Isn't this the campaign that Michael Moore hailed as a sign of things to come? That "anyone who supported 'George Bush's war'...their days were numbered" or some such nonsense?


4 posted on 10/30/2006 10:56:20 PM PST by PowerPro (OBSESSION: THE NEW DOCUMENTARY ABOUT RADICAL ISLAM VS. THE WEST ... http://www.obsessionthemovie.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Rats lament loser Lamont.
Liberal lemmings leaning Lieberman.


5 posted on 10/30/2006 10:58:32 PM PST by Stallone ("Ridicule is the Best Test of Truth" - Earl of Shaftesbury)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Ahhh... I just love it! (I'm from Connecticut)

Thanks, Ivan... ;-)

6 posted on 10/30/2006 11:00:51 PM PST by nutmeg (National security trumps everything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; conservogirl

.

USA's abandoning a then Free South Vietnam long ago =


Pictures of a vietnamese Re-Education Camp

http://www.Freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1308949/posts


Now it's:

Quo Vadis, Iraq..?

Quo Vadis, USA..?


(Quo Vadis = "Where go you?" ..in Latin)

.


7 posted on 10/30/2006 11:05:19 PM PST by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon; scoopscandal; 2Trievers; LoneGOPinCT; Rodney King; sorrisi; MrSparkys; monafelice; ...

Connecticut ping!

You're going to enjoy this article... :o)

Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent Connecticut ping list.

8 posted on 10/30/2006 11:07:11 PM PST by nutmeg (National security trumps everything else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"We have not shown that same level of respect for the troops coming home now from the troops that came home from Vietnam, frankly."

That explains why the OIC at Oakland Army Barracks advised GIs returning from Vietnam not to wear our uniforms after we left post. He was afraid we'd be mobbed by the adoring crowds, and never make our flights home.

9 posted on 10/30/2006 11:11:28 PM PST by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

You got that right! Lieberman is a liberal, but the liberals will throw him to the wolves because he's not liberal ENOUGH. Proof that the Democrat party (the one I used to know) is no more.


10 posted on 10/30/2006 11:18:55 PM PST by Just Lori (Thank you, United States Air Force! Sixty years of awesome service!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Although I'm an original goldwater conservative, I always liked Joe Lieberman. He's a true gentleman like Zoe Miller. And like Reagan said : I didn't leave the democratic party, they left ME(a conservative democrat). After they fail again next week, perhaps, just perhaps they will wake up and realize, as they "auger in" to oblivion, that you can't fly an airplane with just one(left)wing. Lieberman, Miller, even Traficant wasn't much of a RIGHT wing but now even that stubby wing is GONE....Prediction : there will be very little change in the house and senate numbers...the real question is the "perot effect", disaffected republicans not voting.


11 posted on 10/30/2006 11:22:22 PM PST by timer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"We have not shown that same level of respect for the troops coming home now from the troops that came home from Vietnam, frankly."

this idiotic statement should be coupled with Kerry's to remind people how clueless these rats are about our military

12 posted on 10/30/2006 11:33:40 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PowerPro
Isn't this the campaign that Michael Moore hailed as a sign of things to come?

You mean this guy?


13 posted on 10/30/2006 11:55:07 PM PST by Cobra64 (Why is the War on Terror being managed by the DEFENSE Department?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: timer
Being from Florida I remember old Joe being in on the effort to block military absentee ballots in the "Gore War." He has yet to apologize for that round of thievery so he fails to meet the criteria of a gentleman and has certainly not lived up to his oath.

Even so he is the better part of that dilapidated pile of flaky human debitage known as the Democrat Party.

14 posted on 10/30/2006 11:55:13 PM PST by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"It'll be taken as a strong affirmation of George Bush's policies that, even in Connecticut, Joe Lieberman and George Bush won a majority of the vote."

Hey... I agree with Lemont!

15 posted on 10/31/2006 1:33:04 AM PST by paudio (Universal Human Rights and Multiculturalism: Liberals want to have cake and eat it too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

Another good example of the limits of advertising money. If ad dollars determined behavior, the Edsel would have been a smash hit for Ford, many Hollyweird bombs would have been smash hits at the box office, and any number of doofus politicians with deep pockets would have been elected.

If your product is stinko, all the advertising in the world will not move it, as this particular doofus is about to discover.


16 posted on 10/31/2006 1:49:52 AM PST by Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
We have not shown that same level of respect for the troops coming home now from the troops that came home from Vietnam, frankly."

Psychotic election cycle alert

17 posted on 10/31/2006 2:20:21 AM PST by x_plus_one (Franklin Graham: "Allah is not the God of Moses. Allah had no son")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"Tough love". Sheesh, what a fool.

"This is a war of ideas," he told supporters in a library in Hamden. "If we stay true to who we are, we win that war."

Too bad poor Ned is too busy fighting his own countrymen to realize who his real enemy is. Imagine the look of surprise on ol' Ned's face just before the jihadi's slit his throat.

18 posted on 10/31/2006 3:35:17 AM PST by prairiebreeze (Motto of the Democrat party: If we can't rule America, we fully intend to ruin America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan

THIS certainly a strange cycle. For the only time in my life I contributed to a Democrat. I gave Liar man $25.00 just to have the pleasure of being able to claim a part in the victory I knew he would get. Funny thing, I told them not to bother asking me for more because I am a Republican consultant and it would be a waste of time. They never did, which is something I've never seen before either. As I said: This IS a strange cycle.


19 posted on 10/31/2006 4:05:36 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (DON'T BELIEVE PESSIMISM: FEELINGS ARE FOR LOVE SONGS. FACTS ARE FOR PREDICTING WHO WINS IN NOV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spanaway Lori

I don't think Moveon.org scumbags are through with that race yet.


20 posted on 10/31/2006 4:20:47 AM PST by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson