Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The collapse of this Democrat trick will help help put Jim Talent over the top.
1 posted on 10/30/2006 10:25:40 AM PST by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jmaroneps37

Fingers crossed.


2 posted on 10/30/2006 10:27:16 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (BTUs are my Beat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
So much for secretly passing the constitutional amendment in the dark of night. Missouri voters are in a full-fledged debate about cloning and they are beginning to see the light.

Neener neener neener!

3 posted on 10/30/2006 10:27:43 AM PST by The Blitherer (You were given the choice between war & dishonor. You chose dishonor & you will have war. -Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
The Michael J. Fox ad caused several Missouri celebrities, who are opposed to Amendment 2, to create their own ad starring...

It would help if the good guys would do research and tell the truth in their reporting.

This ad was already being made before the Michael J. Fox ad was aired.
4 posted on 10/30/2006 10:27:44 AM PST by msnimje (You simply cannot be Christian and Pro-Abortion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
BTTT from Missouri!

Carolyn

5 posted on 10/30/2006 10:29:24 AM PST by CDHart ("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

http://www.nocloning.org/video2.html


6 posted on 10/30/2006 10:32:18 AM PST by rightinthemiddle (Without the Media, the Left and Islamofacists are Nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

And the Dems did it to themselves.

If they would have just kept their mouths shut about Rush's comments, chances are this thing would have sailed through.

But, being Dems, they just couldn't help themselves to try to 'demonize' a republican.

Sucks to be them.


7 posted on 10/30/2006 10:36:09 AM PST by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37; 1stMarylandRegiment; 47carollann; A Citizen Reporter; A Cyrenian; adrian; AFLoggie; ...
Missouri ping

Low volume (normally) ping list

FReepmail me to be on, or off, this list.

9 posted on 10/30/2006 10:38:01 AM PST by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
So much for secretly passing the constitutional amendment in the dark of night. Missouri voters are in a full-fledged debate about cloning and they are beginning to see the light.

Sorry, they've been advertising the hell out of this for weeks, at least on radio and now on TV. Kind of odd if they were hoping to sneak it past anyone.

13 posted on 10/30/2006 10:40:39 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Better link to story

http://townhall.com/columnists/JonathanGarthwaite/2006/10/29/missouri_stem-cell_debate_gets_the_spotlight


18 posted on 10/30/2006 10:50:33 AM PST by listenhillary (Islam = Religion of peace. If you say otherwise, we'll kill you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Why don't the advocates of stem cell research put their money toward privately-funded research, instead of buying ad time to advocate for public funding of research?


20 posted on 10/30/2006 10:52:50 AM PST by oblomov (Join the FR Folding@Home Team (#36120) keyword: folding@home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Question: Why would the drafters of this measure specifically create a Constitutional right to clone human beings?

I'll be back in ten minutes with the answer.


21 posted on 10/30/2006 11:05:28 AM PST by gridlock (The 'Pubbies will pick up at least TWO seats in the Senate and FOUR seats in the House in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
polling has shown that the number of people whose vote is a “certain yes” on the measure has dropped from 57% to 45%.

Before cheering too loud, the "Certain No" votes are still smaller.

I've gone from Pro Ammendment to ambivalent primarily over I dont want to change the constitution over every little thing and you folks may be right. There hasnt been a problem yet, so why take a chance on screwing the constitution up. IF the legislature starts making people leave the state for medical treatment, then vote the idiots out even if they have an R after their name.

26 posted on 10/30/2006 11:20:52 AM PST by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

This is good news. :) I'm glad Rush spotlighted this.


50 posted on 10/31/2006 3:41:39 AM PST by EmilyGeiger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson