Refusing to defend the institution of marriage may win Hillary the Democrat nomination, but it will cost her the presidency.
1 posted on
10/30/2006 5:13:31 AM PST by
Jack Bull
To: Jack Bull
Trading a bedrock principle that marriage is between a man and a woman for a block of votes is not shrewd. It is deeply misguided, short-sighted and in no way in the best interest of the country. Sort of like getting one's husband to pardon Puerto Rican terrorists before an election.
Nothing to worry about, it will all be forgotten shortly.
2 posted on
10/30/2006 5:17:36 AM PST by
glorgau
To: Jack Bull
Her common ground is nothing but quicksand.
3 posted on
10/30/2006 5:21:39 AM PST by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: Jack Bull
However, the monied hedonists will now pour money to HER coffers rather than any other source.
Democrats view homosexuals as easy money.
This is all about fundraising.
4 posted on
10/30/2006 5:25:50 AM PST by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Jack Bull
Well, now she can go ahead and marry Janet Reno.
Pray for W and Our Troops
5 posted on
10/30/2006 5:28:27 AM PST by
bray
(Voting for the Rats is a Death Wish)
To: Jack Bull
This is no big deal. Hillary is a democrat. If she wants to support gay marriage during the primaries and be opposed to gay marriage during the general election, it's no problem. The MSM will provide plenty of cover.
To: Jack Bull
This will have an effect on her run in the senate this year, but not enough time for John Spencer to capitalize on it. New York generally while liberal, is generally FDR type liberal and very Catholic!
8 posted on
10/30/2006 5:35:27 AM PST by
mdmathis6
(Save the Republic! Mess with the polling firms' heads!)
To: Jack Bull
It is misguided to think that Mrs. Clinton's highest goal is to win the presidency. If it happens, all the better. The Clinton's have always feen about political fame and what it will bring. She and her husband havealways taken the quick and easy way to money. Just getting the nomination is enough for her. There's a lot of loose money in a presidential campaign and much more to be had in residual notoriety after the election, win or lose. That couple is the incarnation of "The Grifters". She is the perfect example of a human being growing to adulthood without a soul. If I had more time, I'd tell you what I really think.
9 posted on
10/30/2006 5:40:33 AM PST by
burroak
To: Jack Bull
Ha just like this woman claimed that the Republicans in the House of Representative would outlaw Jesus if they could, over immigration, yet she voted for their Bill on border security. The ink did not even get dried when what was the assault to the "morals voters" the next day, they were Foleized.
She will pull the same "Good Samaritan" card out over this perversion of the word marriage. Let's not forget that she got Billy Grahams' blessing as making a goooood leader. Don't think she has not planned for every eventuality.
To: Jack Bull
She is just supporting those of her personal persuasion.
14 posted on
10/30/2006 6:21:48 AM PST by
hgro
To: Jack Bull
She is just supporting those of her personal persuasion.
15 posted on
10/30/2006 6:21:52 AM PST by
hgro
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson