Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mark was here

In answer to your last question, she did not sue the government and never would. Beyond that, I will not discuss her personal business.


54 posted on 10/29/2006 7:08:09 AM PST by Sergeant Tim (In the War on Terror, there is no place to run from here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Sergeant Tim
In answer to your last question, she did not sue the government and never would. Beyond that, I will not discuss her personal business.

I am talking about signing a form in agreement not to sue the airlines, in exchange for a taxpayer funded pile of cash. Not about suing the government. It should be a simple mater to tell the truth. You said "My sister-in-law did not want to spend the next 10 or 20 years in litigation. She had kids to raise and hearts, including hers, to heal.", this would imply that she took the cash, otherwise litigation would of never entered the picture. Taking of public funds, should be a public mater. If she did not take any whats the big deal in saying she did not? Odds are however that she did because most people jumped for a chance at the cash, I know, kids to raise and hearts to heal.

57 posted on 10/29/2006 7:24:54 AM PST by Mark was here (How can they be called "Homeless" if their home is a field?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson