To: JohnHuang2
Vote for us because they're worse... Yes, it's valid, yes, it is true, yes, it details what horrors a liberal congress can bring, but it is just as agenda-less as the Democrats.
Put forward goals, folks. Tell us what a Republican congress will do over the next two years. Set a task, and plan on how to accomplish it, and move forward.
I'm grossly sick of Republicans treading water.
2 posted on
10/28/2006 12:49:02 AM PDT by
kingu
(No, I don't use sarcasm tags - it confuses people.)
To: JohnHuang2
As I recall before we ever entered Iraq a significant number of liberals were opposed. Was not their A.N.S.W.E.R. groupies seeking to initiate bloodshed right here on our own ground to prevent the removal of Saddam.
I remember the cries, wales, and moans about N.Korea was worse and more of a threat than Saddam, and even some of these who supposedly swore an oath and allegiance to our Constitution went to the that land of confusion pretending to play a role of human shields.
Then when Baghdad fell, what sent these liberals over and around the bend, no protection of museums.
Every step of the way these liberals have joined the insurgents as though they were one and the same.
To: JohnHuang2
This goes hand-in-hand with the Washington Post decrying negative campaining (from the GOP only, of course). The fact is, if you refuse to define yourself, your opponent will gladly do it for you.
16 posted on
10/28/2006 3:40:22 AM PDT by
kevkrom
(Conspiracy rule #1: The lack of any evidence whatsoever is, ipso facto, proof that a cover-up exists)
To: JohnHuang2
28 posted on
10/28/2006 3:02:48 PM PDT by
Gritty
(First, Liberals opposed the Islamofascists. Then they noticed whose side they were on.-EM Terrell)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson